Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGanjigatti, R.R.
dc.contributor.authorBennani, V.
dc.contributor.authorAarts, J.M.
dc.contributor.authorChoi, J.J.E.
dc.contributor.authorBrunton, Paul
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-23T02:58:16Z
dc.date.available2024-04-23T02:58:16Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationGanjigatti, R.R. and Bennani, V. and Aarts, J.M. and Choi, J.J.E. and Brunton, P.A. 2021. Efficacy and safety of Botulinum toxinA for improving esthetics in facial complex: A systematic review. Brazilian Dental Journal. 32 (4): pp. 31-44.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/94918
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/0103-6440202104127
dc.description.abstract

Aim: To evaluate efficacy and safety of Botulinum toxinA for improving esthetics in the facial complex and correlating them to the dosage and side effects through a systematic review. Methods: A literature search was performed using PubMed, Medline, Web of Sciences, and Scopus databases. Quality of studies was appraised through the GRADE system. This review follows the ‘Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols’ (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Efficacy was analyzed through improvement rate and effect sizes. Graphical comparison of efficacy and ocular adverse effects (adverse effects around the eye) at various anatomical locations was made by calculating the average improvement rate and adverse events. Results: Twenty-five studies were included in this systematic review after application of the inclusion criteria. Moderate to severe cases in glabellar, lateral canthal, and forehead regions showed higher improvement rates between 20U to 50U, with an effect lasting up to 120 days. Gender and age seemed to have a direct effect on efficacy. Headaches were the most common adverse effect, followed by injection site bruising; all adverse effects resolved within 3-4 days. Conclusions: Treatment with Botulinum toxinA to enhance esthetics of facial complex is efficient and safe at all recommended dosages. Presence of complexing proteins influenced the efficacy of BoNT-A. undesirable muscular adverse effects around the eyes were more predominant when treating the glabellar region. There was no correlation found between the BoNT-A dosage and side effects, however, an increase in dosage did not always lead to an increase in efficacy.

dc.languageeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectBotulinum Toxins, Type A
dc.subjectEsthetics, Dental
dc.subjectMeta-Analysis as Topic
dc.subjectSkin Aging
dc.subjectEsthetics, Dental
dc.subjectSkin Aging
dc.subjectMeta-Analysis as Topic
dc.subjectBotulinum Toxins, Type A
dc.titleEfficacy and safety of Botulinum toxinA for improving esthetics in facial complex: A systematic review
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume32
dcterms.source.number4
dcterms.source.startPage31
dcterms.source.endPage44
dcterms.source.issn0103-6440
dcterms.source.titleBrazilian Dental Journal
dc.date.updated2024-04-23T02:58:15Z
curtin.departmentOffice of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor, Academic
curtin.accessStatusOpen access
curtin.facultyOffice of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor, Academic
curtin.contributor.orcidBrunton, Paul [0000-0001-9726-2987]
dcterms.source.eissn1806-4760
curtin.contributor.scopusauthoridBrunton, Paul [7003684965]
curtin.repositoryagreementV3


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/