Unlocking the gates to the peasants: are policies of 'fairness' or 'inclusion' more important for equity in higher education?
MetadataShow full item record
Attempts to make higher education more equitable more readily succeed at the aggregate (sector) level than at the institutional, with students from disadvantaged groups being overrepresented in low-status institutions. It is suggested that this is because policies of 'fairness' (i.e. proportional representation) dominate the contemporary policy framework and are strongly resisted by elite universities. However, using the Australian higher education sector as an example, this paper argues that equity policy is actually a mix of 'proportional fairness' and 'inclusion' and elite institutions resist not because the policy is deficient but because it might actually work. An alternative approach to higher education.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Sinclair-Jones, Janet A. (1996)Over the past ten years Australian higher education has undergone a transformation from a binary structure, marked by a division of 'traditional universities' and colleges of advanced education, to a uniform university ...
Pitman, Tim (2016)In 2014, the Australian Federal Government attempted to de-regulate higher education fees so as to allow universities to set their own tuition fees. The associated public debate offer critical insights into how the identity ...
Widening access in a fee-deregulated system: exploring contemporary ideals of 'fair' access to higher educationPitman, Tim (2015)This article explores the notion of 'fairness' in higher education policy, analysing the proposed 2014 reforms of the Australian higher education sector and with particular reference to the attempt to deregulate student ...