How can an Independent Third-Party Support High-Quality Deliberation to Bridge the Gap between Organic and Induced Participation in Pune, India?
dc.contributor.author | Menon, Sanskriti | |
dc.contributor.supervisor | Dora Marinova | en_US |
dc.contributor.supervisor | Janette Hartz-Karp | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-03T06:55:32Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-03T06:55:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/86296 | |
dc.description.abstract |
This mixed-methods action research in Pune India aimed to understand public perceptions about governance and participation, applying a public survey, and implementing high-quality deliberation processes. Using an independent third party, the western model of mini publics was adapted for implementation in India. It was found that deliberative democracy can provide a satisfactory space for participation, learning, and developing balanced outcomes. With insufficient government support of deliberative initiatives, the role of the third party becomes essential. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Curtin University | en_US |
dc.title | How can an Independent Third-Party Support High-Quality Deliberation to Bridge the Gap between Organic and Induced Participation in Pune, India? | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dcterms.educationLevel | PhD | en_US |
curtin.department | School of Design and the Built Environment | en_US |
curtin.accessStatus | Open access | en_US |
curtin.faculty | Humanities | en_US |
curtin.contributor.orcid | Menon, Sanskriti [0000-0003-2871-7938] | en_US |