Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBurke, Gary R.
dc.contributor.supervisorthe late Dr Michael Booth
dc.contributor.supervisorProf. Roy Jones
dc.contributor.supervisorProf. Dora Marinova
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T09:56:03Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T09:56:03Z
dc.date.created2013-08-09T08:05:34Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/952
dc.description.abstract

Conventionally, the neoclassical economic discourse is used to interpret sustainability. Sustainability is regarded as an economic problem and sustainability policies focus on maintaining various forms of capital. This approach is conceptually inadequate and it is unable to recognise or correct systemic non‐sustainability that perpetuates unsustainable behaviour.This thesis challenges the epistemological authority of neoclassical economics as being an appropriate policy framework for creating effective sustainability policy.The extent, significance and persistence of sustainability issues suggest thatremediation is beyond the capacity of conventional policy approaches. The newunderstandings of complexity and uncertainty make new conceptual andmethodological demands on policy makers. The dominance and intransigence ofthe neoclassical economic episteme means that changes towards sustainability aremore than simple reform processes; conceptual and cognitive change is needed.This thesis suggests that economics needs to be, and can be, reconceptualised and reframed within a sustainability‐informed ontology that includes economic, social, cultural and ecological layers. It describes a Viability Analysis framework that accommodates pluralist, multidimensional viability constructs. It proposes a sustainability‐informed system of national accounts in which economic activity is recalibrated with qualitative data within a reconceptualised sustainability‐informed taxonomy of categories. The sustainability‐informed system of national accounts provides policy makers and businesses with information that can be used to steer economic activity towards sustainability paths. Using an opt‐in approach, businesses can qualify for lower tax rates by demonstrating their movement towards sustainability. By framing economics within a sustainability‐informed ontology and accounting narrative, a symbiosis between economics and sustainability is possible so that sustainable behaviour can be economically viable, and economic viability can be sustainable.

dc.languageen
dc.publisherCurtin University
dc.titleMaking viability sustainable
dc.typeThesis
dcterms.educationLevelPhD
curtin.departmentSchool of Humanities, Curtin University Sustainability Policy Institute
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record