Pick me! Perceptual differences of graduate recruitment and selection methods
Access Status
Fulltext not available
Authors
Johns, R.
Teo, Stephen
Harrington, K.
Date
2007Type
Journal Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Johns, R. and Teo, S. and Harrington, K. 2007. Pick me! Perceptual differences of graduate recruitment and selection methods. Employment Relations Record. 7 (1): pp. 1-10.
Source Title
Employment Relations Record
Additional URLs
ISSN
Collection
Abstract
This article reports the findings from a study which examines the adoption of recruitment and selection methods for graduates in Australia by examining the differences and similarities in the perceptions between graduate recruiters and recent graduates. The study reveals that a wide range of selection methods are used to recruit graduates into Australian firms and that if recruiters wish to attract the best graduates, they should be well-versed in the way these potential recruits perceive the usefulness and importance of recruitment and selection methods.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Harrison, C.; Hauck, Yvonne; Ashby, R. (2017)© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Accessible summary: What is known on the subject?: The rate of mental illness in the general population is ever increasing Mental health nurses are ageing, and this is not a preferred career ...
-
Zablotska, I.; Frankl, A.; Holt, M.; De Wit, J.; Brown, Graham; Maycock, B.; Fairley, C.; Prestage, G. (2014)©2014 Zablotska et al. Background: Behavioural surveillance and research among gay and other men who have sex with men (GMSM) commonly relies on non-random recruitment approaches. Methodological challenges limit their ...
-
Hildebrand, J.; Burns, S.; Zhao, Y.; Lobo, R.; Howat, Peter; Allsop, S.; Maycock, B. (2015)Background: Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a method successfully used to research hard-to-access populations. Few studies have explored the use of the Internet and social media with RDS, known as Web-based RDS (WebRDS). ...