Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAusten, Siobhan
dc.contributor.authorJefferson, Therese
dc.contributor.authorThein, Vicki
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T11:19:41Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T11:19:41Z
dc.date.created2008-11-12T23:36:35Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.citationAusten, Siobhan and Jefferson, Therese and Thein, Vicki. 2003. Gendered social indicators and grounded theory. Feminist Economics 9 (1): 1-18.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/10568
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/1354570032000063065
dc.description.abstract

This article outlines a pilot program undertaken to assess the advantages and disadvantages of including significant elements of grounded theory in research measuring women's progress. This pilot program, carried out in Western Australia, aimed at broadening the range of data collection and analysis methods in the field of gendered social and economic indicators. It featured ten affinity group discussions with sixty-two women and six men on the issue of women's progress in the region. The results have implications for future research on women's well-being

dc.publisherRoutledge
dc.subjectQualitative Research
dc.subjectFocus Groups
dc.subjectSocial Indicators
dc.subjectWomen's Status
dc.subjectGrounded Theory
dc.subjectFeminist Methodology
dc.titleGendered social indicators and grounded theory
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume9
dcterms.source.number1
dcterms.source.monthmar
dcterms.source.startPage1
dcterms.source.endPage18
dcterms.source.titleFeminist Economics
curtin.identifierEPR-3089
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available
curtin.facultyCurtin Business School
curtin.facultySchool of Economics and Finance


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record