Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHarris, P.
dc.contributor.authorWei, J.
dc.contributor.authorShen, A.
dc.contributor.authorAbdile, A.
dc.contributor.authorPaynter, S.
dc.contributor.authorHuxley, Rachel
dc.contributor.authorPandeya, N.
dc.contributor.authorDoi, Y.
dc.contributor.authorHuh, K.
dc.contributor.authorO'Neal, C.
dc.contributor.authorTalbot, T.
dc.contributor.authorPaterson, D.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T11:26:08Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T11:26:08Z
dc.date.created2016-02-04T19:30:29Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationHarris, P. and Wei, J. and Shen, A. and Abdile, A. and Paynter, S. and Huxley, R. and Pandeya, N. et al. 2016. Carbapenems versus alternative antibiotics for the treatment of bloodstream infections caused by Enterobacter, Citrobacter or Serratia species: a systematic review with meta-analysis.. J Antimicrob Chemother. 71 (2): pp. 296-306.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/11647
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jac/dkv346
dc.description.abstract

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review and meta-analysis compared effects of different antibiotics on mortality in patients with bloodstream infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae with chromosomal AmpC ß-lactamase. METHODS: Databases were systematically searched for studies reporting mortality in patients with bloodstream infections caused by AmpC producers treated with carbapenems, broad-spectrum ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs), quinolones or cefepime. Pooled ORs for mortality were calculated for cases that received monotherapy with these agents versus carbapenems. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42014014992; 18 November 2014). RESULTS: Eleven observational studies were included. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed on studies reporting empirical and definitive monotherapy. In unadjusted analyses, no significant difference in mortality was found between BLBLIs versus carbapenems used for definitive therapy (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.32-2.36) or empirical therapy (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.14-1.60) or cefepime versus carbapenems as definitive therapy (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.27-1.38) or empirical therapy (0.60; 95% CI 0.17-2.20). Use of a fluoroquinolone as definitive therapy was associated with a lower risk of mortality compared with carbapenems (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.19-0.78). Three studies with patient-level data were used to adjust for potential confounders. The non-significant trends favouring non-carbapenem options in these studies were diminished after adjustment for age, sex and illness severity scores, suggestive of residual confounding. CONCLUSIONS: Despite limitations of available data, there was no strong evidence to suggest that BLBLIs, quinolones or cefepime were inferior to carbapenems. The reduced risk of mortality observed with quinolone use may reflect less serious illness in patients, rather than superiority over carbapenems.

dc.titleCarbapenems versus alternative antibiotics for the treatment of bloodstream infections caused by Enterobacter, Citrobacter or Serratia species: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume71
dcterms.source.number2
dcterms.source.startPage296
dcterms.source.endPage306
dcterms.source.titleJ Antimicrob Chemother
curtin.departmentSchool of Public Health
curtin.accessStatusOpen access via publisher


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record