Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAbdul Raheem, Raheema
dc.contributor.authorBinns, Colin
dc.contributor.authorChih, Hui Jun
dc.contributor.authorSauer, Kay
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T11:26:11Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T11:26:11Z
dc.date.created2015-01-28T20:00:42Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationAbdul Raheem, R. and Binns, C. and Chih, H. and Sauer, K. 2014. Determinants of the Introduction of Prelacteal Feeds in the Maldives. Breastfeeding Medicine. 9 (9): pp. 473-478.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/11659
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/bfm.2014.0028
dc.description.abstract

Background and Objectives: This study identified the determinants of the introduction of prelacteal feeds in the Maldives. Subjects and Methods: A cohort of 458 mothers was recruited from antenatal clinics at two major hospitals in Malé, the Maldives. The mothers were followed up after birth at 4 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. The child's birth, the type of infant delivery, the time breastfeeding was initiated, gender of the infants, types of prelacteal feeds, and feeding method were recorded. Results: After birth, 4.1% of infants received infant formula from the hospitals, whereas 10.6% and 7.4% of them received honey and dates, respectively, as prelacteal ritual feeds. Factors associated with introduction of ritual feeds as prelacteal feeds included the infant being a boy (p=0.05; adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=1.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07–2.98), attitude toward prelacteal feeds (p=0.01; AOR=2.87; 95% CI, 1.48–5.58), and maternal employment (p=0.01; AOR=2.3; 95% CI, 1.4–3.9). Higher maternal age was inversely associated with introduction of ritual feeds as a prelacteal feed (p=0.05; AOR=0.5; 95% CI, 0.3–0.9). Introduction of infant formula as the prelacteal feed was positively associated with birth by cesarean section (p=0.01; AOR=4.6; 95% CI, 1.6–13.3) and inversely associated with maternal mother's feeding method being breastfeeding (p=0.05; AOR=0.15; 95% CI, 0.04–0.6). Prelacteal feeding was associated with cessation of breastfeeding before 6 months (p=0.01; AOR 6.0; 95% CI, 1.64–21.80). Conclusions: Health professionals need to distinguish between religious and cultural practices in order to develop appropriate health education programs to reduce the unnecessary use of early additional feeds. Understanding the barriers related to the initiation of breastfeeding after cesarean section is also important.

dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Inc. Publishers
dc.titleDeterminants of the Introduction of Prelacteal Feeds in the Maldives
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume9
dcterms.source.number9
dcterms.source.startPage473
dcterms.source.endPage478
dcterms.source.issn1556-8253
dcterms.source.titleBreastfeeding Medicine
curtin.departmentSchool of Public Health
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record