Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLau, James
dc.contributor.authorMartin-Sardesai, A.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T11:27:59Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T11:27:59Z
dc.date.created2015-03-03T20:13:58Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationLau, J. and Martin-Sardesai, A. 2012. The role of organisational concern for workplace fairness in the choice of a performance measurement system. The British Accounting Review. 44 (3): pp. 157-172.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/11976
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.bar.2012.07.006
dc.description.abstract

Prior studies linking performance management systems (PMS) and organisational justice have examined how PMS influence procedural fairness. Our investigation differs from these studies. First, it examines fairness as an antecedent (instead of as a consequence) of the choice of PMS. Second, instead of conceptualising organisational fairness as procedural fairness, it relies on the impression management interpretation of organisational fairness. Hence, the study investigates how the need of senior managers to cultivate an impression of being fair is related to the choice of PMS systems and employee outcomes. Based on a sample of 276 employees, the results indicate that the need of senior management to cultivate an impression of being fair is associated with employee performance. They also indicate that a substantial component of these effects is indirect through the choice of comprehensive performance measures (CPM) and employee job satisfaction. These findings highlight the importance of organisational concern for workplace fairness as an antecedent of choice of CPM. From a theoretical perspective, the adoption of the impression management interpretation of organisational fairness contributes by providing new insights into the relationship between fairness and choice of PMS from a perspective that is different from those used in prior management accounting research.

dc.publisherAcademic Press
dc.titleThe role of organisational concern for workplace fairness in the choice of a performance measurement system
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume44
dcterms.source.number3
dcterms.source.startPage157
dcterms.source.endPage172
dcterms.source.issn0890-8389
dcterms.source.titleThe British Accounting Review
curtin.departmentSchool of Accounting
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record