Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHirt, Christian
dc.contributor.authorFeatherstone, Will
dc.contributor.authorClaessens, Sten
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T11:28:29Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T11:28:29Z
dc.date.created2011-05-01T20:01:27Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationHirt, Christian and Featherstone, Will and Claessens, Sten. 2011. On the accurate numerical evaluation of geodetic convolution integrals. Journal of Geodesy. 85 (8): pp. 519-538.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/12053
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00190-011-0451-5
dc.description.abstract

In the numerical evaluation of geodetic convolution integrals, whether by quadrature or discrete/fast Fourier transform (D/FFT) techniques, the integration kernel is sometimes computed at the centre of the discretised grid cells. For singular kernels - a common case in physical geodesy - this approximation produces significant errors near the computation point, where the kernel changes rapidly across the cell. Rigorously, mean kernels across each whole cell are required. We present one numerical and one analytical method capable of providing estimates of mean kernels for convolution integrals. The numerical method is based on Gauss-Legendre quadrature (GLQ) as efficient integration technique. The analytical approach is based on kernel weighting factors, computed in planar approximation close to the computation point, and used to convert non-planar kernels from point to mean representation. A numerical study exemplifies the benefits of using mean kernels in Stokes?s integral. The method is validated using closed-loop tests based on the EGM2008 global gravity model, revealing that using mean kernels instead of point kernels reduces numerical integration errors by a factor of ~5 (at a grid-resolution of 10 arc minutes). Analytical mean kernel solutions are then derived for 14 other commonly used geodetic convolution integrals: Hotine, Etvs, Green-Molodensky, tidal displacement, ocean tide loading, deflection-geoid, Vening-Meinesz, inverse Vening-Meinesz, inverse Stokes, inverse Hotine, terrain correction, primary indirect effect, Molodensky's G1 term and the Poisson integral. We recommend that mean kernels be used to accurately evaluate geodetic convolution integrals, and the two methods presented here are effective and easy to implement.

dc.publisherSpringer - Verlag
dc.subjectGauss-Legendre quadrature
dc.subjectnumerical integration
dc.subjectpoint kernel
dc.subjectmean kernel
dc.subjectkernel weighting factor
dc.subjectConvolution integrals
dc.titleOn the accurate numerical evaluation of geodetic convolution integrals
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume85
dcterms.source.startPage519
dcterms.source.endPage538
dcterms.source.issn09497714
dcterms.source.titleJournal of Geodesy
curtin.note

The original publication is available at : http://www.springerlink.com

curtin.departmentDepartment of Spatial Sciences
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record