Ballot Bungles: Lessons from the Australian Senate
Access Status
Authors
Date
2014Type
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Source Title
Additional URLs
ISSN
School
Collection
Abstract
This article provides an overview of the controversy surrounding the 2013 election of senators for Western Australia and the judgment of the High Court of Australia sitting as the Court of Disputed Returns in Australian Electoral Commission v. Johnston. The Court ordered a fresh election for all six senators. The article seeks to distill the key lessons from the case, particularly in respect of the Court’s interpretation of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918. The case highlights some weaknesses of the Australian electoral system and opportunities for reform. The article affirms recommendations to change the voting system to reduce the impact of preference deals on election outcomes and the disproportionate influence of micro-parties in the Australian Senate. Further, it argues that Australia should move to adopt electronic voting for federal elections..
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Fenna, Alan (2013)As noted in the opening chapter, Australia has a liberal-democratic system of government, incorporating, on the one side, the principle of majority rule and governmental accountability and, on the other, the principle of ...
-
Tania, Sharmin; Yates, Rachel (2019)The concept of ‘unconscionable dealing’ in statutory consumer protection provisions, such as s 12CB of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth), has been the subject of extensive consideration ...
-
Botica, Zoe (2017)The rise in international parental child abductions can be attributed to the growing rate of inter-cultural marriages and divorces, the increasing ease of international travel, and cross-border communication via the use ...