Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGreen, D.
dc.contributor.authorEijsvogels, T.
dc.contributor.authorBouts, Y.
dc.contributor.authorMaiorana, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorNaylor, L.
dc.contributor.authorScholten, R.
dc.contributor.authorSpaanderman, M.
dc.contributor.authorPugh, C.
dc.contributor.authorSprung, V.
dc.contributor.authorSchreuder, T.
dc.contributor.authorJones, H.
dc.contributor.authorCable, N.T.
dc.contributor.authorCable, N.T.
dc.contributor.authorHopman, M.
dc.contributor.authorThijssen, D.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T11:29:44Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T11:29:44Z
dc.date.created2014-10-14T20:00:17Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationGreen, D. and Eijsvogels, T. and Bouts, Y. and Maiorana, A. and Naylor, L. and Scholten, R. and Spaanderman, M. et al. 2014. Exercise training and artery function in humans: nonresponse and its relationship to cardiovascular risk factors. Journal of Applied Physiology. 117: pp. 345-352.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/12271
dc.identifier.doi10.1152/japplphysiol.00354.2014
dc.description.abstract

The objectives of our study were to examine 1) the proportion of responders and nonresponders to exercise training in terms of vascular function; 2) a priori factors related to exercise training-induced changes in conduit artery function, and 3) the contribution of traditional cardiovascular risk factors to exercise-induced changes in artery function. We pooled data from our laboratories involving 182 subjects who underwent supervised, large-muscle group, endurance-type exercise training interventions with pre-/posttraining measures of flow-mediated dilation (FMD%) to assess artery function. All studies adopted an identical FMD protocol (5-min ischemia, distal cuff inflation), contemporary echo-Doppler methodology, and observer-independent automated analysis. Linear regression analysis was used to identify factors contributing to changes in FMD%. We found that cardiopulmonary fitness improved, and weight, body mass index (BMI), cholesterol, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) decreased after training, while FMD% increased in 76% of subjects (P < 0.001). Training-induced increase in FMD% was predicted by lower body weight (β = −0.212), lower baseline FMD% (β = −0.469), lower training frequency (β = −0.256), and longer training duration (β = 0.367) (combined: P < 0.001, r = 0.63). With the exception of a modest correlation with total cholesterol (r = −0.243, P < 0.01), changes in traditional cardiovascular risk factors were not significantly related to changes in FMD% (P > 0.05).In conclusion, we found that, while some subjects do not demonstrate increases following exercise training, improvement in FMD% is present in those with lower pretraining body weight and endothelial function. Moreover, exercise training-induced change in FMD% did not correlate with changes in traditional cardiovascular risk factors, indicating that some cardioprotective effects of exercise training are independent of improvement in risk factors.

dc.publisherThe American Physiological Society
dc.subjectendothelial function
dc.subjectnitric oxide
dc.subjectphysical activity
dc.subjectflow-mediated dilation
dc.subjectcardiovascular risk
dc.titleExercise training and artery function in humans: nonresponse and its relationship to cardiovascular risk factors
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume117
dcterms.source.startPage345
dcterms.source.endPage352
dcterms.source.issn87507587
dcterms.source.titleJournal of Applied Physiology
curtin.departmentSchool of Physiotherapy
curtin.accessStatusOpen access via publisher


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record