Build better bones with exercise: Protocol for a feasibility study of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 12 months of home exercise in women with a vertebral fracture
Access Status
Authors
Date
2014Type
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Source Title
ISSN
School
Collection
Abstract
Background - Our goal is to conduct a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) to investigate whether exercise can reduce incident fractures compared with no intervention among women aged ≥65 years with a vertebral fracture. Objectives - This pilot study will determine the feasibility of recruitment, retention, and adherence for the proposed trial. Design - The proposed RCT will be a pilot feasibility study with 1:1 randomization to exercise or attentional control groups. Setting - Five Canadian sites (1 community hospital partnered with an academic center and 4 academic hospitals or centers affiliated with an academic center) and 2 Australian centers (1 academic hospital and 1 center for community primary care, geriatric, and rehabilitation services). Participants - One hundred sixty women aged ≥65 years with vertebral fracture at 5 Canadian and 2 Australian centers will be recruited. Intervention - The Build Better Bones With Exercise (B3E) intervention includes exercise and behavioral counseling, delivered by a physical therapist in 6 home visits over 8 months, and monthly calls; participants are to exercise ≥3 times weekly. Controls will receive equal attention. Measurements - Primary outcomes will include recruitment, retention, and adherence. Adherence to exercise will be assessed via calendar diary. Secondary outcomes will include physical function (lower extremity strength, mobility, and balance), posture, and falls. Additional secondary outcomes will include quality of life, pain, fall self-efficacy, behavior change variables, intervention cost, fractures, and adverse events. Analyses of feasibility objectives will be descriptive or based on estimates with 95% confidence intervals, where feasibility will be assessed relative to a priori criteria. Differences in secondary outcomes will be evaluated in intention-to-treat analyses via independent Student t tests, chi-square tests, or logistic regression. The Bonferroni method will be used to adjust the level of significance for secondary outcomes so the overall alpha level is .05. Limitations - No assessment of bone mineral density will be conducted. The proposed definitive trial will require a large sample size. Conclusions - The viability of a large-scale exercise trial in women with vertebral fractures will be evaluated, as well as the effects of a home exercise program on important secondary outcomes.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Giangregorio, L.; Gibbs, J.; Templeton, J.; Adachi, J.; Ashe, M.; Bleakney, R.; Cheung, A.; Hill, Keith; Kendler, D.; Khan, A.; Kim, S.; McArthur, C.; Mittmann, N.; Papaioannou, A.; Prasad, S.; Scherer, S.; Thabane, L.; Wark, J. (2018)© 2018, International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation. Summary: We pilot-tested a trial of home exercise on individuals with osteoporosis and spine fracture. Our target enrollment was met, ...
-
Brown, Z.; Gibbs, J.; Adachi, J.; Ashe, M.; Hill, Keith; Kendler, D.; Khan, A.; Papaioannou, A.; Prasad, S.; Wark, J.; Giangregorio, L. (2017)BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate the Balance Outcome Measure for Elder Rehabilitation (BOOMER) in community-dwelling women 65 years and older with vertebral fracture and to describe score distributions and ...
-
Cameron, I.; Dyer, S.; Panagoda, C.; Murray, G.; Hill, Keith; Cumming, R.; Kerse, N. (2018)Background: Falls in care facilities and hospitals are common events that cause considerable morbidity and mortality for older people. This is an update of a review first published in 2010 and updated in 2012. Objectives: ...