Life-Cycle Cost Analysis to Evaluate Infrastructure Pavement Design in Western Australia
MetadataShow full item record
Decision-support tools and asset management throughout the life-cycle and at the planning phase of civil infrastructure projects are essential for stakeholders charged with the determination of cost-effective design-solutions over the useful life of an asset. The need for a LCCA (life-cycle cost analysis) to guide economic decision-making when comparing competing alternatives is explored by project review of actual specification alternatives towards a case-study that contrasts the pavement design options of: concrete; and, asphalt. Clear cost foundations are applicable. Cost factors were obtained from actual live valid experience predominately. Discussion is made of the processes involved in developing a LCCA model for infrastructure with consideration of options; namely direct whole-life cost comparison of: thin asphalt surfaced unbound granular pavement (AC); and, continually reinforced concrete pavement (CRCP). Life-cycle periods of 100, 60 and 30 years, with an 8% discount rate (incorporating sensitivity analyses), results indicate that a pavement alternative of asphalt is least cost in all cases. This project vindicates and validates the need for a LCCA for civil engineering pavement, and specifically recommends that asphalt is a less expensive infrastructure alternative than concrete in Western Australia.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Whyte, Andrew; Pham, Anna (2012)Asset management and decision-support tools at the planning phase and throughout the life-cycle ofcivil infrastructure projects are essential for stakeholders charged with the determination of costeffectivedesign-solutions ...
Whyte, Andrew; Gayner, L. (2013)Life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) is an engineering tool to assist design specification decisionmaking, estimate whole-life cost of civil engineering projects and help clarify sustainable choices. This paper investigates ...
Hasan, U.; Whyte, Andrew; Al Jassmi, H. (2019)Life-cycle management of road network projects traditionally emphasise material production and construction stages, with less attention given to usage stage and functionality improvement. Increasingly there is a need to ...