Autonomy and trust in professional ethics
MetadataShow full item record
This paper examines recent discussions of the key ideas of autonomy and trust in the professional ethics literature. We argue that while there is a consensus on the nature of professions and professional ethics, there is no agreement on the philosophical basis of this consensus. Some authors, most notably in the bioethics field, derive professional ethics from general philosophical ethics. We argue that these derivations have so far been flawed, since any general ethics must apply equally to both professional and client, and thus it is difficult to see how the special obligations of professionals are grounded. We don't offer any solution to this problem, just a diagnosis of it.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Fan, Ying Han (2008)This study involves a first attempt to identify Chinese auditors’ values and examines their effects on ethical ideologies and ethical judgments and intentions. A survey methodology is used and the survey instrument includes ...
O'Connell, B.; Carnegie, G.; Carter, A.; de Lange, Paul; Hancock, P.; Helliar, C.; Watty, K. (2015)This multi-stakeholder investigation with a prospective focus and conducted 25 years after the Mathews Committee Inquiry has three aims: ? assess the current state of play of accounting in business education in Australia; ...
A study of Australian and Chinese accountants' attitudes towards independence issues and the impact on ethical judgementsFan, Ying; Woodbine, Gordon; Cheng, W. (2013)Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to further extend research (Fan et al., 2012a) examining the attitudes of Chinese certified public accountants with respect to independence aspects of their professional codes of ...