Phase I trial of the oral PARP inhibitor olaparib in combination with paclitaxel for first- or second-line treatment of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer
MetadataShow full item record
Introduction: This Phase I study evaluated the safety, tolerability and efficacy of olaparib, a potent oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, in combination with paclitaxel in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Methods: Eligible patients who had received =1 prior cytotoxic regimen for mTNBC were treated with olaparib 200 mg bid continuously plus weekly paclitaxel 90 mg/m2 for three weeks per four-week cycle. Dose modifications in a large proportion of patients due to neutropenia resulted in enrollment of a second cohort of patients who, if they experienced grade =2 neutropenia in cycle 1, received granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, which was continued prophylactically in subsequent cycles. All patients had measurable disease; tumor responses were evaluated according to RECIST (version 1.0). Results:Nineteen patients (cohort 1, n = 9; cohort 2, n = 10) received treatment; 15 had received prior taxane chemotherapy. The most frequent adverse events were diarrhea (n = 12, 63%), nausea (n = 11, 58%) and neutropenia (n = 11, 58%). Seven neutropenia events were reported in cohort 1 (four grade =3) and four in cohort 2 (two grade =3, including one event of febrile neutropenia). The median (range) dose intensity of paclitaxel was 57% (26 to 100%) in cohort 1 and 73% (29 to 100%) in cohort 2. Seven patients (37%) had a confirmed partial response; one patient remains on olaparib monotherapy without progression. Conclusions: The combination of olaparib and weekly paclitaxel was complicated by a significant clinical interaction, with higher-than-expected rates of neutropenia despite secondary prophylaxis. Given the encouraging response rate, alternative scheduling and dosing strategies should be considered (funded by AstraZeneca; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00707707). © 2013 Dent et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Comparing neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel vs paclitaxel both followed by anthracycline regimens in women with ERBB2/ HER2-negative breast cancer-the evaluating treatment with neoadjuvant abraxane (ETNA) trial a randomized phase 3 clinical trialGianni, L.; Mansutti, M.; Anton, A.; Calvo, L.; Bisagni, G.; Bermejo, B.; Semiglazov, V.; Thill, M.; Chacon, J.; Chan, Arlene; Morales, S.; Alvarez, I.; Plazaola, A.; Zambetti, M.; Redfern, A.; Dittrich, C.; Dent, R.; Magazzu, D.; De Fato, R.; Valagussa, P.; Tusquets, I. (2018)© 2018 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. IMPORTANCE Studies of neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens using anthracyclines followed by taxanes have reported a doubling of pathological complete remission (pCR) ...
Final Results of the Randomized Phase II NorCap-CA223 Trial Comparing First-Line All-Oral Versus Taxane-Based Chemotherapy for HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast CancerCinieri, S.; Chan, Arlene; Altundag, K.; Vandebroek, A.; Tubiana-Mathieu, N.; Barnadas, A.; Dodyk, P.; Lazzarelli, S.; Botha, M.; Rauch, D.; Villanova, G.; Coskun, U. (2017)© 2016 Elsevier Inc.Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 3 first-line chemotherapy combination regimens for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Patients and Methods: In this ...
Phase II, open-label trial of lapatinib and vinorelbine in women with previously treated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancerChan, Arlene; Shannon, C.; De Boer, R.; Baron-Hay, S.; Redfern, A.; Bauwens, A.; Craft, P.; Webb, S.; Townsend, A.; Kotasek, D. (2014)Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of lapatinib (L) and intravenous vinorelbine (V) in patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer who have previously received two lines of anti-HER2 therapy (i.e. ...