Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFan, J.
dc.contributor.authorGuo, Xiumei
dc.contributor.authorMarinova, Dora
dc.contributor.authorZhao, D.
dc.contributor.authorZhang, M.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T11:49:34Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T11:49:34Z
dc.date.created2016-09-11T19:30:38Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationFan, J. and Guo, X. and Marinova, D. and Zhao, D. and Zhang, M. 2016. Assessment of China’s Poor County Program. Journal of Community Practice. 24 (3): pp. 264-282.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/15394
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10705422.2016.1201563
dc.description.abstract

© 2016 Taylor & Francis. China made remarkable progress in rural poverty alleviation. A major policy instrument is the County Level Poverty Alleviation Program, which has vast policy support but is also criticized for targeting errors, misuse of funds, and making poverty both shameful and attractive. Whether this program, or the country’s economic growth in general, is the main force in poverty reduction is the question addressed in this article, analyzing data for the 592 poor counties. The response to the economic growth–policy alleviation conundrum is that a push for social wellbeing and empowerment is needed together with economic growth to achieve major poverty improvements.

dc.titleAssessment of China’s Poor County Program
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume24
dcterms.source.number3
dcterms.source.startPage264
dcterms.source.endPage282
dcterms.source.issn1070-5422
dcterms.source.titleJOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PRACTICE
curtin.departmentSustainability Policy Institute
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record