Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMiller, Paul
dc.contributor.authorMulvey, C.
dc.contributor.authorMartin, N.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T11:51:21Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T11:51:21Z
dc.date.created2011-11-18T01:21:19Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationMiller, Paul and Mulvey, Charles and Martin, Nick. 2006. The return to schooling: estimates from a sample of young Australian twins. Labour Economics. 13 (5): pp. 571-587.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/15697
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.labeco.2004.10.008
dc.description.abstract

This study uses a sample of young Australian twins to examine whether the findings reported in Ashenfelter and Krueger (1994) and Miller, Mulvey, and Martin (1994) are robust to choice of sample and dependent variable. The economic return to schooling in Australia is between 5 and 7 percent when account is taken of genetic and family effects using either fixed-effects models or the selection effects model of Ashenfelter and Krueger. Given the similarity of the findings in this and in related studies, it would appear that the models applied by Ashenfelter and Krueger are robust. Moreover, viewing the OLS and IV estimators as lower and upper bounds in the manner of Black, Berger and Scott (2000), it is shown that the bounds on the return to schooling in Australia are much tighter than in Ashenfelter and Krueger, and the return is bounded at a much lower level than in the US.

dc.publisherElsevier BV * North-Holland
dc.subjectTwins
dc.subjectAbility
dc.subjectWages
dc.titleThe return to schooling: estimates from a sample of young Australian twins
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume13
dcterms.source.number5
dcterms.source.startPage571
dcterms.source.endPage587
dcterms.source.issn0927-5371
dcterms.source.titleLabour Economics .
curtin.departmentSchool of Economics and Finance
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record