Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGray, Dennis
dc.contributor.authorSaggers, Sherry
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T11:53:18Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T11:53:18Z
dc.date.created2016-09-12T08:36:24Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationGray, D. and Saggers, S. 2009. The Evidence Base for Responding to Substance Misuse in Indigenous Minority Populations. In Preventing Harmful Substance Use: The Evidence Base for Policy and Practice, 381-393: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/16014
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/9780470713624.ch31
dc.description.abstract

This chapter provides a review of the effectiveness of measures to prevent psychoactive substance misuse in indigenous minority populations in Australia, NewZealand, Canada and the United States of America. Despite considerable heterogeneity between and within these populations, there are also important commonalities. Generally, levels of substance misuse are significantly higher among them than among the non-indigenous majority populations of those countries and this results in commensurately high rates of substance caused health and social problems These levels of misuse and harm are socially determined. They are a consequence of a complex hierarchy of social relationships-including common histories of colonialism and dispossession and economic and social marginalisation-that influence both demand for and supply of various substances. As well as focusing on interventions to address the obvious manifestations of substance misuse, strategies to prevent the elevated levels of substance misuse among indigenous peoples must address the underlying social determinants. Interventions aimed specifically at indigenous populations usually seek: to make interventions for general populations more culturally appropriate for indigenous populations; to address those factors that exacerbate levels of substance misuse and related harm among indigenous populations; or to employ elements of indigenous cultures to address misuse and related harm. Such interventions-which generally focus on the individual, family or community levels-are considered under the headings: supply reduction, demand reduction and harm reduction. Rigorous evaluations of these interventions are relatively few but point to some successes and to the factors that contribute to them. © 2005 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd
dc.titleThe Evidence Base for Responding to Substance Misuse in Indigenous Minority Populations
dc.typeBook Chapter
dcterms.source.startPage381
dcterms.source.endPage393
dcterms.source.titlePreventing Harmful Substance Use: The Evidence Base for Policy and Practice
dcterms.source.isbn9780470092279
curtin.departmentNational Drug Research Institute (NDRI)
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record