Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGaston, Noel
dc.contributor.authorRajaguru, G.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T11:57:13Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T11:57:13Z
dc.date.created2014-04-08T20:00:29Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationGaston, Noel and Rajaguru, Gulasekaran. 2008. The Rise (and Fall) of Labour Market Programmes: Domestic vs. Global Factors. Oxford Economic Papers. 60 (4): pp. 619-648.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/16691
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/oep/gpn002
dc.description.abstract

We provide a simple model to illustrate that tax and redistributive considerations as well as increasing globalization may lead workers unexposed to the threat of unemployment to prefer government spending on active labour market programmes to passive spending, e.g., on unemployment benefits. In the empirical work, panel data for OECD countries are used to examine the relationship between active and passive labour market spending and various controls relevant for analysing the political economy of labour market policies. Overall, we find that domestic concerns, such as government indebtedness, are far more important determinants of labour market expenditures than global influences.

dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.subjectlabour market programmes
dc.subjectpanel data for OECD countries
dc.subjectlabour market spending
dc.titleThe Rise (and Fall) of Labour Market Programmes: Domestic vs. Global Factors
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume60
dcterms.source.startPage619
dcterms.source.endPage648
dcterms.source.issn0030-7653
dcterms.source.titleOxford Economic Papers
curtin.department
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record