Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKent, Peter
dc.contributor.authorHancock, M.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T11:58:31Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T11:58:31Z
dc.date.created2017-01-10T19:30:18Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationKent, P. and Hancock, M. 2016. Interpretation of dichotomous outcomes: sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and pre-test and post-test probability. Journal of Physiotherapy. 62 (4): pp. 231-233.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/16914
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jphys.2016.08.008
dc.description.abstract

This is the second Research Note in a two-part series on the interpretation of statistical methods used to analyse dichotomous outcomes. The first paper covered risk, odds, risk ratios, odds ratios, and number needed to treat. This paper focuses on sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and pre-test and post-test probability. These additional measures are calculated from 2 x 2 contingency tables, as were the risk ratios and odds ratios previously covered.

dc.publisherAustralian Physiotherapy Association
dc.titleInterpretation of dichotomous outcomes: sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and pre-test and post-test probability
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume62
dcterms.source.number4
dcterms.source.startPage231
dcterms.source.endPage233
dcterms.source.issn1836-9553
dcterms.source.titleJournal of Physiotherapy
curtin.note

This open access article is distributed under the Creative Commons license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

curtin.departmentSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record