Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPitman, Tim
dc.contributor.authorVidovich, L.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T12:02:45Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T12:02:45Z
dc.date.created2014-11-19T01:13:24Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationPitman, T. and Vidovich, L. 2013. Converting RPL into academic capital: Lessons from Australian universities. International Journal of Lifelong Education. 32 (4): pp. 501-517.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/17582
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02601370.2013.778075
dc.description.abstract

Recognition of prior learning (RPL) requires an assessment of the equivalence and transferabilityof learning acquired in one context to another. However, this study’s examinationof the institutional policies and practices of three Australian universities reveals thatRPL can also be understood as a Bourdieuian process of ‘capital conversion’, where anindividual’s economic, social and cultural capital are assessed as being equivalent to ‘academicexperience’. This approach reveals that, far from being an epistemological assessmentof prior learning, universities also consider their organisational identity and statuswhen considering what informal or non-formal learning will be accepted. Ultimately, whatcounts as prior learning depends as much upon which university is doing the assessment,its motive for doing so and the extent to which it views RPL as a normative threat.

dc.publisherRoutledge
dc.titleConverting RPL into academic capital: Lessons from Australian universities
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume32
dcterms.source.number4
dcterms.source.startPage501
dcterms.source.endPage517
dcterms.source.issn0260-1370
dcterms.source.titleInternational Journal of Lifelong Education
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record