Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPhilllips, R.
dc.contributor.authorBohman, B.
dc.contributor.authorAnthony, J.
dc.contributor.authorKrauss, S.
dc.contributor.authorDixon, Kingsley
dc.contributor.authorPeakall, R.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T12:09:50Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T12:09:50Z
dc.date.created2015-08-12T20:00:58Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationPhilllips, R. and Bohman, B. and Anthony, J. and Krauss, S. and Dixon, K. and Peakall, R. 2015. Mismatch in the distribution of floral ecotypes and pollinators: insights into the evolution of sexually deceptive orchids. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 28: pp. 601-612.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/18760
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jeb.12593
dc.description.abstract

Plants are predicted to show floral adaptation to geographic variation in the most effective pollinator, potentially leading to reproductive isolation and genetic divergence. Many sexually deceptive orchids attract just a single pollinator species, limiting opportunities to experimentally investigate pollinator switching. Here, we investigate Drakaea concolor, which attracts two pollinator species. Using pollinator choice tests, we detected two morphologically similar ecotypes within D. concolor. The common ecotype only attracted Zaspilothynnus gilesi, whereas the rare ecotype also attracted an undescribed species of Pogonothynnus. The rare ecotype occurred at populations nested within the distribution of the common ecotype, with no evidence of ecotypes occurring sympatrically. Surveying for pollinators at over 100 sites revealed that ecotype identity was not correlated with wasp availability, with most orchid populations only attracting the rare Z. gilesi. Using microsatellite markers, genetic differentiation among populations was very low (GST = 0.011) regardless of ecotype, suggestive of frequent gene flow. Taken together, these results may indicate that the ability to attract Pogonothynnus has evolved recently, but this ecotype is yet to spread. The nested distribution of ecotypes, rather than the more typical formation of ecotypes in allopatry, illustrates that in sexually deceptive orchids, pollinator switching could occur throughout a species’ range, resulting from multiple potentially suitable but unexploited pollinators occurring in sympatry. This unusual case of sympatric pollinators highlights D. concolor as a promising study system for further understanding the process of pollinator switching from ecological, chemical and genetic perspectives.

dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing
dc.subjectpopulation genetics
dc.subjectDrakaea concolor
dc.subjectorchid
dc.subjectrare
dc.subjectspeciation
dc.subjectecotype
dc.subjectfloral odour
dc.subjectpollination
dc.subjectmicrosatellites
dc.titleMismatch in the distribution of floral ecotypes and pollinators: insights into the evolution of sexually deceptive orchids
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume28
dcterms.source.startPage601
dcterms.source.endPage612
dcterms.source.issn1010-061X
dcterms.source.titleJournal of Evolutionary Biology
curtin.accessStatusOpen access via publisher


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record