Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarton, Glenton
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, Annette
dc.contributor.authorPinto, Dale
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T12:10:47Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T12:10:47Z
dc.date.created2014-12-15T20:00:36Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationBarton, G. and Morgan, A. and Pinto, D. 2014. The WET: Is it a Good Drop?. Tax Specialist. 18 (2): pp. 54-59.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/18938
dc.description.abstract

The wine equalisation tax (WET), introduced by the A New Tax System (Wine Equalisation Tax) Act 1999 (Cth), is, in essence, a wholesale sales tax on certain wine containing a specified content of potable alcohol that is sold for consumption in Australia. The apparent fiscal purpose of the Act is to reduce and recoup the public costs of alcohol abuse. The hallmarks of sound tax legislation are traditionally encapsulated in the tax policy principles of simplicity, equity, economic efficiency and fiscal adequacy. This article explores the extent to which these hallmarks are reflected in the rules of the Act. The authors conclude that the WET is not a "good tax" in light of any of the principles, and its deficiencies raise the threshold issue of whether alcohol taxation is an appropriate way to address the public costs of alcohol abuse. In the authors' opinion, there is no valid argument for its retention.

dc.publisherTaxation Institute of Australia
dc.titleThe WET: Is it a Good Drop?
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume18
dcterms.source.startPage54
dcterms.source.endPage59
dcterms.source.issn1329-1203
dcterms.source.titleTax Specialist
curtin.note

First published with The Tax Institute

curtin.departmentSchool of Business Law
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record