Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMullins, Ben
dc.contributor.authorMead-Hunter, Ryan
dc.contributor.authorPitta, R.
dc.contributor.authorKasper, G.
dc.contributor.authorHeikamp, W.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T12:11:49Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T12:11:49Z
dc.date.created2014-07-07T20:00:19Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationMullins, B. and Mead-Hunter, R. and Pitta, R. and Kasper, G. and Heikamp, W. 2014. Comparative Performance of Philic and Phobic Oil-Mist Filters. AIChE Journal. 60 (8): pp. 2976-2984.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/19084
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/aic.14479
dc.description.abstract

The evolution of pressure drop, drainage rate, saturation, and efficiency of combined philic, and phobic oil mist filters in real-time are examined. The experiments used four different filter configurations, with a combination of oleophobic and oleophilic fibrous filter media, and one oleophilic only reference. The effect of separating filter materials of differing wettability, with a mesh, was also explored. It was found that inclusion of a mesh between layers promoted increased drainage rates and resulted in a significantly lower pressure drop across the filter. The overall mass-based filtration efficiency was also slightly higher for the configurations containing the mesh. Conversely, re-entrainment of droplets from the rear face of the filter was only observed in filter configurations without the central mesh. Filters with oleophobic initial layers did not display a classical “depth filtration” pressure drop curve. The oleophobic media was found to possess lower steady-state saturation than oleophilic media. Additionally, the steady-state saturation of the oleophilic filter media, when placed at the rear of the filter, was lower when the central mesh was present. The saturation values were compared with recently published theory.

dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.subjectsaturation
dc.subjectoil-mist
dc.subjectefficiency
dc.subjectequilibrium
dc.subjectfilter
dc.titleComparative Performance of Philic and Phobic Oil-Mist Filters
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume60
dcterms.source.number8
dcterms.source.startPage2976
dcterms.source.endPage2984
dcterms.source.issn0001-1541
dcterms.source.titleAI Ch E Journal
curtin.department
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record