Guilty or Angry? The politics of emotion in accounts of hepatitis C transmission
Access Status
Authors
Date
2010Type
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Source Title
Additional URLs
ISSN
Collection
Abstract
In accounts of hepatitis C, subtle distinctions are frequently made between “innocent” and “guilty” forms of transmission. Although such distinctions have been extensively critiqued, they continue to manifest in indirect ways, such as the articulation of emotions. We argue for a critical approach to the way in which emotions function in accounts of hepatitis C by analyzing textual accounts of hepatitis C, and interviews with people who have hepatitis C in Australia. Drawing upon the work of theorist Sara Ahmed, we argue that emotions work to constitute subjects, objects, and collectivities, including some individuals and excluding others. In this regard, the articulation of emotion can contribute to the marginalization and stigmatization of people living with hepatitis C. We also explore ways people with hepatitis C negotiate frameworks of guilt/responsibility. We conclude by considering how health promotion and policy texts might better address emotional responses to diagnosis without reproducing stigmatizing assumptions.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Rhodes, T.; Rance, J.; Fraser, Suzanne; Treloar, C. (2017)© 2017Public health research treats intimate partnerships as sites of risk management, including in the management of HIV and hepatitis C transmission. This risk-infused biomedical approach tends to undermine appreciation ...
-
Hepatitis C treatment in pharmacotherapy services: Increasing treatment uptake needs a critical viewTreloar, C.; Fraser, Suzanne (2009)Issues: In an effort to increase the number of people undergoing hepatitis C treatment, a range of initiatives are planned or underway to provide treatment in non-specialist services, such as opioid pharmacotherapy treatment ...
-
Fraser, Suzanne (2010)Knowledge about disease and illness usually emerges as a result of complex social negotiations among those with a stake in the outcomes of this knowledge. These negotiations can involve a range of agents and discursive ...