Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorO'Gorman, D.
dc.contributor.authorYousif, O.
dc.contributor.authorDixon, G.
dc.contributor.authorMcQuaid, S.
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, E.
dc.contributor.authorRahman, Y.
dc.contributor.authorGasparro, D.
dc.contributor.authorPacini, G.
dc.contributor.authorNewsholme, Philip
dc.contributor.authorNolan, J.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T12:16:19Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T12:16:19Z
dc.date.created2016-09-12T08:36:25Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationO'Gorman, D. and Yousif, O. and Dixon, G. and McQuaid, S. and Murphy, E. and Rahman, Y. and Gasparro, D. et al. 2008. In vivo and in vitro studies of GAD-antibody positive subjects with Type 2 diabetes: A distinct sub-phenotype. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 80 (3): pp. 365-370.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/19890
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.diabres.2007.12.009
dc.description.abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if immune mechanisms in GAD positive patients' contribute to the pathogenesis of a specific sub-type of Type 2 diabetes. GAD positive (n = 8) and GAD negative (n = 8) subjects diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes were matched for age, gender, body mass index, duration of diabetes and glycaemic control. All subjects underwent an insulin-modified frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test to measure insulin sensitivity and insulin secretory function with minimal model analysis. In addition, BRIN-BD11 clonal ß-cells were supplemented with patients' sera to determine basal and alanine-stimulated insulin secretion and terminal complement complex (TCC) formation. Both groups were severely insulin resistant (0.56 ± 0.17 vs. 0.99 ± 0.33 10-4 min-1/(µU ml-1) for GADneg and GADpos, respectively) but the GAD negative subjects had a higher basal (87 ± 11 vs. 58 ± 14 pmol l-1, p < 0.05) and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (?AUCins 0.96 ± 0.12 vs. 0.60 ± 0.12 pmol/(l-1 min), p < 0.05). In vivo measures of insulin secretion were negatively correlated with TCC formation, independent of antibody status. In conclusion, GAD positive subjects initially diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes are unable to compensate for insulin resistance due to more pronounced ß-cell impairment. TCC formation may be partly responsible for the insulin secretory dysfunction associated with this specific sub-type of Type 2 diabetes. © 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

dc.publisherElsevier Ireland Ltd
dc.titleIn vivo and in vitro studies of GAD-antibody positive subjects with Type 2 diabetes: A distinct sub-phenotype
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume80
dcterms.source.number3
dcterms.source.startPage365
dcterms.source.endPage370
dcterms.source.issn0168-8227
dcterms.source.titleDiabetes Research and Clinical Practice
curtin.departmentSchool of Biomedical Sciences
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record