Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGambiza, T.
dc.contributor.authorPinto, Dale
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T12:17:22Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T12:17:22Z
dc.date.created2016-07-28T19:30:17Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationGambiza, T. and Pinto, D. 2016. Sharing the rides but are we sharing the profits? The Tax Specialist. 19 (5): pp. 187-198.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/20095
dc.description.abstract

Ride-sharing services like Uber are posing major challenges to traditional taxation models. This is because business profits generated by Uber and similar companies are perceived to be “geographically divorced” from the provision of ride-sharing services themselves. To that extent, host countries that physically support the income-generating activities might lose out on the tax revenue because the “digital company” could be based in another country. This article considers the OECD’s BEPS project against companies like Uber to determine how and where profits are made, and how the concepts of source and residence are applied to characterise income for tax purposes in a consistent way. This article also seeks to establish: (1) the taxation models in Australia, France and the United States that are applied to capture taxable income; (2) how income tax is captured at a personal level earned from employment; and (3) the enforceability of regulations in different local governments.

dc.publisherTaxation Institue of Australia
dc.titleSharing the rides but are we sharing the profits?
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume19
dcterms.source.number5
dcterms.source.startPage187
dcterms.source.endPage198
dcterms.source.titleThe Tax Specialist
curtin.departmentCurtin Law School
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record