Cost-Effectiveness of a Programme to Detect and Provide Better Care for Female Victims of Intimate Partner Violence
MetadataShow full item record
Objective: Primary care clinicians often fail to detect women who are victims of intimate partner violence (IPV). Our aim was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of a programme in primary care to detect and support such women. Methods: We developed a Markov model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of education and support for primary care clinicians to increase their identification of survivors of IPV and to refer them to a specialist advocacy agency or a psychologist with specialist skills. The programme was implemented in three general practices in the United Kingdom (with an additional practice acting as a control) and provided cost data and rates of identification and referral. Other cost data and the effectiveness of IPV advocacy came from published sources. Results: The model gave an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of approximately £2,450 per quality adjusted life year (QALY). Although the ratio increased in some of the sensitivity analyses, most were under a conventional willingness to pay threshold (£30,000/QALY).Conclusions: While there is considerable uncertainty in the underlying parameters, a training programme for primary care teams to increase identification and referral of women experiencing IPV is likely to be cost effective.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Cost-Effectiveness of Identification and Referral to Improve Safety (IRIS), a Domestic Violence Training and Support Programme for Primary Care: a Modelling Study Based on a Randomised Controlled TrialDevine, A.; Spencer, A.; Eldridge, S.; Norman, Richard; Gene, F. (2012)Objective: The Identification and Referral to Improve Safety (IRIS) cluster randomised controlled trial tested the effectiveness of a training and support intervention to improve the response of primary care to women ...
How Far Does Screening Women for Domestic (Partner) Violence in Different Health-Care Settings Meet Criteria for a Screening Programme? Systematic Reviews of Nine UK National Screening Committee CriteriaFeder, G.; Ramsay, J.; Dunne, D.; Rose, M.; Arsene, C.; Norman, Richard; Kuntze, S.; Spencer, A.; Bacchus, L.; Hague, G.; Warburton, A.; Taket, A. (2009)Objectives: The two objectives were: (1) to identify, appraise and synthesise research that is relevant toselected UK National Screening Committee (NSC) criteria for a screening programme in relation to partner violence; ...
The 6-PACK programme to decrease falls and fall-related injuries in acute hospitals: protocol for an economic evaluation alongside a cluster randomised controlled trialMorello, R.; Barker, A.; Zavarsek, S.; Watts, J.; Haines, T.; Hill, Keith; Sherrington, C.; Brand, C.; Jolley, D.; Stoelwinder, J. (2012)Falls are a common hospital occurrence complicating the care of patients. From an economic perspective, the impact of in-hospital falls and related injuries is substantial. However, few studies have examined the economic ...