Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPritchard, Deborah
dc.contributor.authorDavies, Jill
dc.contributor.authorHo, K.
dc.contributor.authorPenney, N.
dc.contributor.editorWiesner, D.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T12:24:15Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T12:24:15Z
dc.date.created2009-03-10T18:01:05Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationPritchard, Deborah and Davies, Jill and Ho, Kevin and Penney, Nancy. 2008. Monitoring of waterways for evidence of faecal contamination from biosolids using DNA techniques, in Wiesner, D. (ed), Australian Water Association, Biosolids Specialty Conference IV, Jun 11 2008, Adelaide, SA: Australian Water Association
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/21274
dc.description.abstract

Increased nutrient levels in inland waterways have led to algal blooms and eutrophication in many agricultural regions. To ensure fertiliser inputs are managed more effectively, the source of contamination needs to be tracked and identified. Point sources could include inorganic fertilisers, livestock excreta, or more recently biosolids. The presence of faecal indicator microorganisms has been widely used to identify the presence of faeces, however, these methods cannot distinguish between human and animals samples. This study investigated PCR amplification as a molecular method to distinguish biosolids from livestock faeces of biosolids, cattle, sheep, poultry and kangaroo. This was achieved using published priming sequences and restriction site profiling of amplified DNA across the 16S rRNA gene of anaerobic gastrointestinal bacteria Bacteroides spp and Bifidobacteria spp. Preliminary investigation showed that of the three Bacteroides spp primer pairs investigated, two were useful for cow faecal material; though at lower annealing temperatures were also applicable to biosolids and sheep faecal material. The third primer pair was specific only for biosolids. All three primer pairs were unable to PCR-amplify Bacteroides spp sequences in faecal material of kangaroo. Of the three Bifidobacteria spp primer pairs, one was useful for sheep faecal material; though at lower annealing temperature was also applicable to biosolids and cow and kangaroo faecal material. The Bifidobacterium angulatum specific primer pair enabled the PCR detection of anaerobes only in biosolids and faecal material of kangaroo. The third, a Bifidobacterium catenulatum specific primer pair was suitable for faecal material of cow and at lower annealing temperatures was also applicable to the sample from sheep. Varying degrees of success were observed in faecal material from other animals. Generally, biosolids tested positive for Bacteroides and Bfidobacteria with all primers except for those specific for B. angulatum. For some primer sets, PCR amplification alone could not differentiate biosolids from other faecal samples. The serial dilution of water contaminated by a range of livestock excreta and biosolids is being examined further to enable the sensitivity of this method to be applied in the field.

dc.publisherAustralian Water Association
dc.subjectBacteroides spp
dc.subjectBifidobacteria spp
dc.subjectbiosolids
dc.subject16S rRNA gene
dc.subjectlivestock faeces
dc.titleMonitoring of waterways for evidence of faecal contamination from biosolids using DNA techniques.
dc.typeConference Paper
dcterms.source.titleAustralian Water Association, Biosolids Specialty Conference IV
dcterms.source.seriesAustralian Water Association, Biosolids Specialty Conference IV
dcterms.source.isbn9781921335037
dcterms.source.conferenceBiosolids Specialty Conference IV
dcterms.source.conference-start-date11 Jun 2008
dcterms.source.conferencelocationAdelaide, South Australia
dcterms.source.placeArtarmon, New South Wales
curtin.departmentMuresk Institute
curtin.departmentSchool of Agriculture and Environment
curtin.accessStatusOpen access
curtin.facultyScience and Engineering


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record