Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCzajkowski, M.
dc.contributor.authorGiergiczny, M.
dc.contributor.authorGreene, William
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T12:24:16Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T12:24:16Z
dc.date.created2015-12-24T20:00:20Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationCzajkowski, M. and Giergiczny, M. and Greene, W. 2014. Learning and fatigue effects revisited: Investigating the effects of accounting for unobservable preference and scale heterogeneity. Land Economics. 90 (2): pp. 324-351.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/21277
dc.description.abstract

Using multiple choice tasks per respondent in discrete choice experiment studies increases the amount of available information. However, respondents' learning and fatigue may lead to changes in observed utility function preference (taste) parameters, as well as the variance in its error term (scale); they need to be controlled to avoid potential bias. A sizable body of empirical research offers mixed evidence in terms of whether these ordering effects are observed. We point to a significant component in explaining these differences; we show how accounting for unobservable preference and scale heterogeneity can influence the magnitude of observed ordering effects. © 2014 by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System.

dc.titleLearning and fatigue effects revisited: Investigating the effects of accounting for unobservable preference and scale heterogeneity
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume90
dcterms.source.number2
dcterms.source.startPage324
dcterms.source.endPage351
dcterms.source.issn0023-7639
dcterms.source.titleLand Economics
curtin.departmentSchool of Economics and Finance
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record