Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLe, H.
dc.contributor.authorGold, L.
dc.contributor.authorAbbott, G.
dc.contributor.authorCrawford, D.
dc.contributor.authorMcNaughton, S.
dc.contributor.authorMhurchu, C.
dc.contributor.authorPollard, Christina
dc.contributor.authorBall, K.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T12:28:12Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T12:28:12Z
dc.date.created2016-07-12T19:30:18Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationLe, H. and Gold, L. and Abbott, G. and Crawford, D. and McNaughton, S. and Mhurchu, C. and Pollard, C. et al. 2016. Economic evaluation of price discounts and skill-building strategies on purchase and consumption of healthy food and beverages: The SHELF randomized controlled trial. Social Science and Medicine. 159: pp. 83-91.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/21918
dc.description.abstract

Objective: Pricing strategies are a promising approach for promoting healthier dietary choices. However, robust evidence of the cost-effectiveness of pricing manipulations on dietary behaviour is limited. We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of a 20% price reduction on fruits and vegetables and a combined skills-based behaviour change and price reduction intervention. Design and methods Cost-effectiveness analysis from a societal perspective was undertaken for the randomized controlled trial Supermarket Healthy Eating for Life (SHELf). Female shoppers in Melbourne, Australia were randomized to: (1) skill-building (n = 160); (2) price reductions (n = 161); (3) combined skill-building and price reduction (n = 161); or (4) control group (n = 161). The intervention was implemented for three months followed by a six month follow-up. Costs were measured in 2012 Australian dollars. Fruit and vegetable purchasing and consumption were measured in grams/week. Results: At three months, compared to control participants, price reduction participants increased vegetable purchases by 233 g/week (95% CI 4 to 462, p = 0.046) and fruit purchases by 364 g/week (95% CI 95 to 633, p = 0.008). Participants in the combined group purchased 280 g/week more fruits (95% CI 27 to 533, p = 0.03) than participants in the control group. Increases were not maintained six-month post intervention. No effect was noticed in the skill-building group. Compared to the control group, the price reduction intervention cost an additional A$2.3 per increased serving of vegetables purchased per week or an additional A$3 per increased serving of fruit purchased per week. The combined intervention cost an additional A$12 per increased serving of fruit purchased per week compared to the control group.Conclusions: A 20% discount on fruits and vegetables was effective in promoting overall fruit and vegetable purchases during the period the discount was active and may be cost-effective. The price discount program gave better value for money than the combined price reduction and skill-building intervention. The SHELf trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials Registration ISRCTN39432901.

dc.publisherPergamon Press
dc.titleEconomic evaluation of price discounts and skill-building strategies on purchase and consumption of healthy food and beverages: The SHELF randomized controlled trial
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume159
dcterms.source.startPage83
dcterms.source.endPage91
dcterms.source.issn1873-5347
dcterms.source.titleSocial Science and Medicine
curtin.departmentSchool of Public Health
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record