Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFleay, Caroline
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T12:28:49Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T12:28:49Z
dc.date.created2014-10-08T06:00:41Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationFleay, C. 2006. Australian Foreign Policy, Human Rights in China and the Spiral Model. Australian Journal of Political Science. 41 (1): pp. 71-90.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/22021
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10361140500507294
dc.description.abstract

In 1997 Australia changed its human rights policy regarding China from its support for resolutions on China at the UN Commission on Human Rights (UNCHR) to the adoption of the bilateral human rights dialogue process. From 1991 to 1997 the UNCHR process had greatly contributed to the Chinese government making human rights concessions such that China could be considered to be in phase three (tactical concessions) of the spiral model of Thomas Risse, Stephen Ropp and Kathryn Sikkink. To progress to phase four (prescriptive status), continued pressures by international and domestic actors are needed so that support and protection is provided to domestic human rights activists. The annual Australia–China bilateral dialogue meetings do not appear to be contributing to those pressures. However, in a limited way given its small scale, the Australia–China Technical Cooperation Program may help to bring about further human rights improvements in China.

dc.publisherRoutledge Publishing, Taylor & Francis Group
dc.titleAustralian Foreign Policy, Human Rights in China and the Spiral Model
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume41
dcterms.source.number1
dcterms.source.startPage71
dcterms.source.endPage90
dcterms.source.issn1036-1146
dcterms.source.titleAustralian Journal of Political Science
curtin.departmentCentre for Human Rights Education
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record