Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBennett, Dawn
dc.contributor.authorGenoni, Paul
dc.contributor.authorHaddow, Gaby
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T12:34:09Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T12:34:09Z
dc.date.created2011-08-29T20:01:26Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationBennett, Dawn and Genoni, Paul and Haddow, Gaby. 2011. FoR Codes pendulum: Publishing choices within Australian research assessment. Australian Universities Review. 53 (2): pp. 88-98.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/22871
dc.description.abstract

This paper reports on an exploratory case study that considered the impacts of journal ranking and Fields of Research codes on the publishing decisions of Australian authors. The study also considered the level of alignment between authors’ allocation of Fields of Research codes and the codes assigned to the journals in which they were published. The conclusion is reached that authors are still coming to an understanding of the impact of research assessment on their publishing choices and the process of scholarly communication within their discipline. Findings point to a number of concerns about the impact of both journal ranking and discipline-specific research codes.

dc.publisherNTEU
dc.subjectresearch assessment
dc.subjectFields of Research codes
dc.subjectjournal ranking
dc.subjectscholarly communication
dc.subjectmusic education
dc.titleFoR Codes pendulum: Publishing choices within Australian research assessment
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume2
dcterms.source.startPage88
dcterms.source.endPage98
dcterms.source.issn08188068
dcterms.source.titleAustralian Universities Review
curtin.note

Published by National Tertiary Education Union (NTEU)

curtin.departmentCentre for Research and Graduate Studies-Humanities
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record