Agronomic Issues with Alum-Sludge
dc.contributor.author | Rigby, Hannah | |
dc.contributor.author | Pritchard, Deborah | |
dc.contributor.author | Collins, D. | |
dc.contributor.editor | Diane Wiesner | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-30T12:34:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-01-30T12:34:58Z | |
dc.date.created | 2011-03-21T20:01:33Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Rigby, Hannah and Pritchard, Deborah L. and Collins, David. 2010. Agronomic Issues with Alum-Sludge, in Wiesner, D. (ed), Biosolids Specialty Conference V, Jun 2 2010. Sydney, NSW: Australian Water Association. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/23021 | |
dc.description.abstract |
A two year field experiment was established to investigate the use of alum sludge from wastewater treatment for cereal production. Alum sludge (5.0% N, 3.7% P, 7.5% Al) was applied at six rates (0, 3.4, 6.7, 10.1, 13.5 and 20.1 Mg DS ha-1) on a P deficient sand, supplying up to 744 kg P ha-1 at the highest rate. In addition, one rate of inorganic fertiliser at district practice was applied, containing 72 kg N ha-1 and 20 kg P ha-1, this was reapplied in the second year. The inorganic fertiliser treatment yielded 44-58% higher than the nil fertiliser treatment at final grain harvest, demonstrating the requirement for applied N and P on this site for crop production. Alum sludge was an adequate source of nitrogen (N) for crop growth as indicated by plant tissue N content, and supplied sufficient residual N to meet crop requirements in the second year.However, grain yield in alum sludge treatments was reduced to 62% (year 1) and 69% (year 2) of the yield in the inorganic fertiliser treatment, though greater than the nil fertiliser treatment in both years. Plant shoot tissue analysis at 9 weeks after establishment at the tillering stage of development indicated that plants sown in alum sludge-amended soil and in the nil fertiliser treatment were P deficient, whereas P was adequate in the inorganic fertiliser treatment. There was no evidence of any other nutrient deficiency in plant shoot samples besides P. Therefore, it is suggested that on this P deficient soil, the ability of alum sludge to provide P for plant production was limited in the two years after application. | |
dc.publisher | Australian Water Association | |
dc.subject | Alum Sludge | |
dc.subject | phosphorus | |
dc.subject | cereal | |
dc.title | Agronomic Issues with Alum-Sludge | |
dc.type | Conference Paper | |
dcterms.source.title | Biosolids Specialty Conference V | |
dcterms.source.series | Biosolids Specialty Conference V | |
dcterms.source.isbn | 978-1-921335-10-5 | |
dcterms.source.conference | Australian Water Association | |
dcterms.source.conference-start-date | Jun 2 2010 | |
dcterms.source.conferencelocation | The Mecure Hotel, Sydney, NSW | |
dcterms.source.place | St Leonards, NSW | |
curtin.department | Department of Environment and Agriculture | |
curtin.accessStatus | Open access |