Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHill, Kylie
dc.contributor.authorDolmage, T.
dc.contributor.authorWoon, L.
dc.contributor.authorCoutts, D.
dc.contributor.authorGoldstein, R.
dc.contributor.authorBrooks, D.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T12:36:06Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T12:36:06Z
dc.date.created2012-11-29T20:00:26Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationHill, Kylie and Dolmage, Thomas and Woon, Lynda and Coutts, Debbie and Goldstein, Roger and Brooks, Dina. 2012. A simple method to derive speed for the endurance shuttle walk test. Respiratory Medicine. 106 (12): pp. 1665-1670.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/23227
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rmed.2012.08.011
dc.description.abstract

Background: The original method for determining endurance shuttle walk test (ESWT) speed involves components that are time consuming for clinicians. We sought to determine: (i) whether components described in the original method for determining ESWT speed held true and; (ii) the agreement between speeds derived using the original method and that equivalent to 85% of the peak speed achieved during the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT). Methods: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) performed two ISWTs and one ESWT on separate days, wearing a calibrated portable gas analysis unit. A retrospective analysis of these data allowed us to determine whether: (i) the peak rate of oxygen uptake (VO2peak) can be accurately estimated from the incremental shuttle walk distance (ISWD) and; (ii) ESWTs performed at a speed derived using the original method elicited 85% of VO2peak. Agreement between walks speeds was determined using Bland–Altman analysis. Results: Twenty-two participants (FEV1 48 ± 13% predicted, age 66 ± 8 yr) completed the study. The VO2peak estimated from the ISWD was less than that measured during the ISWT (mean difference −4.4; 95% confidence interval (CI), −6.0 to −2.9 ml• kg−1•min−1). The ESWT and ISWT elicited similar VO2peak (mean difference −0.2; 95% CI, −1.5 to 1.2 ml•kg−1•min−1). The mean difference (±limits of agreement) between ESWT speeds was 0.15 (±0.34) km•h−1. Conclusions: Components of the original method for determining the ESWT speed did not hold true in our sample. ESWT speed can be derived by calculating 85% of the peak speed achieved during the ISWT.

dc.publisherWB Saunders Co Ltd
dc.titleA simple method to derive speed for the endurance shuttle walk test
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume106
dcterms.source.number12
dcterms.source.startPage1665
dcterms.source.endPage1670
dcterms.source.issn09546111
dcterms.source.titleRespiratory Medicine
curtin.note

NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Respiratory Medicine. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Respiratory Medicine, Vol. 106, no.12 (2012). Doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2012.08.011

curtin.department
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record