Curtin University Homepage
  • Library
  • Help
    • Admin

    espace - Curtin’s institutional repository

    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    View Item 
    • espace Home
    • espace
    • Curtin Research Publications
    • View Item
    • espace Home
    • espace
    • Curtin Research Publications
    • View Item

    Edge effects in grazed and ungrazed Western Australian wheatbelt remnants in relation to ecosystem reconstruction

    Access Status
    Fulltext not available
    Authors
    Majer, Jonathan
    Scougall, A.
    Hobbs, R.
    Date
    1993
    Type
    Book Chapter
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Scougall, A., J. D. Majer & R. Hobbs (1993). Edge effects in grazed and ungrazed Western Australian wheatbelt remnants in relation to ecosystem reconstruction In: (ed. D. A. Saunders, R. J. Hobbs & P. R. Erhlich) Nature conservation 3: Reconstruction of Fragmented Ecosystems. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton. 163-178.
    Faculty
    School of Agriculture and Environment
    Department of Environmental Biology
    Faculty of Science and Engineering
    Remarks

    Reference Number: #BC24

    PDF file is available from Jonathan Majer Email: J.Majer@curtin.edu.au

    Please cite the Reference number (as above)

    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/23312
    Collection
    • Curtin Research Publications
    Abstract

    This chapter outlines the results of a study of the soil, plants and ant fauna at the edges of fenced and non-fenced remnants of jam (Acacia acuminata)-York gum (Eucalyptus Ioxophleba) woodland in the Kellerberrin district of Western Australia. Specifically, it asks the question "Does farm livestock have a detrimental effect on the abiotic and biotic environment of remnants of native vegetation which are not fenced?" The findings indicate that, for the majority of the habitat variables measured, major differences exist between fenced and nonfenced remnants of vegetation. In comparison to the fenced remnant, the non-fenced remnant had less liner, increased numbers of dead trees, moister, denser soils and elevated levels of soil nutrients. In addition, non-fenced remnants were characterized by reduced tree and shrub abundance, species richness, height and cover, as well as having a greater proportion of non-native herbs. Furthermore, the aggressive, dominant ant functional group (Iridomynnex spp,) formed a greater component of the ant community at non-fenced remnants, whereas the generalized myrmicines were more prevalent at fenced remnants. The main difference between the fenced and non-fenced remnants is that farm livestock can penetrate the non-fenced remnants, livestock are therefore considered to be the principal cause in the decline in environmental quantity of non-fenced remnants.

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Case Study: Visitor Perceptions of Captive Wildlife Tourism in a Western Australian Natural Setting
      Hughes, Michael; Newsome, D.; Macbeth, J. (2005)
      Wildlife tourism involves a broad sweep of experiences that includes all of the aspects of the tourism genre with the distinguishing feature of animals as the primary attraction. The uniqueness of Australian wildlife in ...
    • Field Testing of Fence Type Blast Wall for Blast Load Mitigation
      Hao, Yifei; Hao, Hong; Shi, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zong, R. (2017)
      To protect structures from external explosions, solid protective barriers have been demonstrated by experimental and numerical studies to be able to effectively mitigate blast loads on structures behind them. However, to ...
    • Development of a New Fence Type Blast Wall for Blast Protection: Numerical Analysis
      Zong, R.; Hao, Hong; Shi, Y. (2016)
      © 2017 World Scientific Publishing Company. Blast wall is considered to be an effective passive measure for blast protection since it can effectively reduce the blast loads and protect the building structures and people ...
    Advanced search

    Browse

    Communities & CollectionsIssue DateAuthorTitleSubjectDocument TypeThis CollectionIssue DateAuthorTitleSubjectDocument Type

    My Account

    Admin

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Follow Curtin

    • 
    • 
    • 
    • 
    • 

    CRICOS Provider Code: 00301JABN: 99 143 842 569TEQSA: PRV12158

    Copyright | Disclaimer | Privacy statement | Accessibility

    Curtin would like to pay respect to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander members of our community by acknowledging the traditional owners of the land on which the Perth campus is located, the Whadjuk people of the Nyungar Nation; and on our Kalgoorlie campus, the Wongutha people of the North-Eastern Goldfields.