What makes a 'good' review article? Some reflections and recommendations
| dc.contributor.author | Hagger, Martin | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-30T12:37:08Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-01-30T12:37:08Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2012-08-09T20:00:21Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Hagger, Martin S. 2012. What makes a 'good' review article? Some reflections and recommendations. Health Pscyhology Review. 6 (2): pp. 141-146. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/23423 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/17437199.2012.705556 | |
| dc.publisher | Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group | |
| dc.title | What makes a 'good' review article? Some reflections and recommendations | |
| dc.type | Journal Article | |
| dcterms.source.volume | 6 | |
| dcterms.source.startPage | 141 | |
| dcterms.source.endPage | 146 | |
| dcterms.source.issn | 17437199 | |
| dcterms.source.title | Health Pscyhology Review | |
| curtin.note |
This is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of an article published in the Health Pscyhology Review, 2012, copyright Taylor & Francis, available online at: <a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17437199.2012.705556">http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17437199.2012.705556</a> | |
| curtin.department | ||
| curtin.accessStatus | Open access |