Universal health care in Thailand: Concerns among the health care workforce
|dc.identifier.citation||Thoresen, Stian H. and Fielding, Angela. 2010. Universal health care in Thailand: Concerns among the health care workforce. Health Policy. 99 (1): pp. 17-22.|
Objective. To investigate the impact of the universal health care policy from the perspective of Thai health care professionals. Methods. Semi-structured interviews with purposively selected health care professionals and key informants. Results. Health care professionals at public hospitals, particularly in rural areas, have experienced up to a doubling in the number of daily out-patients; many with superficial symptoms. While the improved access to health care provisions was welcomed, questions regarding the appropriateness of seeking medical advice were raised. Concern regarding equity: between the universal health care policy and two parallel public health cover schemes; rural and urban areas; and the public and private sector also emerged. There are potentials for health care professionals to congregate in the private sector and urban areas where workloads are perceived to be less demanding.Conclusions. The general perception of the health care professionals interviewed suggests that although increased access and health equity was welcomed, this policy has had undesired effects and exacerbated rural-urban and public-private tensions. Universal coverage increased access to health care. However, equity may be further enhanced by consolidating the three public health covers into a single scheme and develop a parallel private income protection insurance scheme.
|dc.publisher||Elsevier Ireland Ltd|
|dc.subject||Attitude of health personnel|
|dc.title||Universal health care in Thailand: Concerns among the health care workforce|
NOTICE: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Health Policy. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Health Policy [99, 1, 2011] DOI 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.07.010
|curtin.department||School of Occupational Therapy and Social Work|