Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVenville, G.
dc.contributor.authorRennie, Leonie
dc.contributor.authorWallace, J.
dc.contributor.editorBarry Fraser
dc.contributor.editorKenneth Tobin
dc.contributor.editorCampbell McRobbie
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T12:38:01Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T12:38:01Z
dc.date.created2013-03-21T20:01:06Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationVenville, Grady and Rennie, Leonie J. and Wallace, John. 2012. Curriculum integration: Challenging the assumption of school science as powerful knowledge, in Fraser, B.J. and Tobin, K.G. and McRobbie, C.J. (ed), Second International Handbook of Science Education, pp. 737-749. Dordrecht: Springer.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/23570
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_49
dc.description.abstract

On the one hand, it is argued that disciplinary approaches to curriculum that include the teaching and learning of traditional, sharply defined subjects, such as physics, chemistry, biology and algebra, provide specialised knowledge that enables rigorous explanation of focused aspects of the world. On the other hand, integrated approaches to schooling are seen to better reflect the realities of students’ experiences outside school by making learning more applied, more critical, more inventive and more meaningful for students. This chapter explores this ‘curriculum tension’ by examining seven issues around which discussion about curriculum integration tends to circulate.

dc.publisherSpringer
dc.titleCurriculum integration: Challenging the assumption of school science as powerful knowledge
dc.typeBook Chapter
dcterms.source.startPage737
dcterms.source.endPage749
dcterms.source.titleSecond International Handbook of Science Education (Part Two)
dcterms.source.isbn9781402090400
dcterms.source.placeDordrecht, The Netherlands
dcterms.source.chapter48
curtin.department
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record