Consensus on the Clinical Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Results of an International Delphi Study
MetadataShow full item record
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. STUDY DESIGN.: Delphi. OBJECTIVE.: Obtain an expert consensus on which history factors are most important in the clinical diagnosis of LSS. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a poorly defined clinical syndrome. Criteria for defining LSS are needed and should be informed by the experience of expert clinicians. METHODS.: Phase 1 (Delphi Items): 20 members of the International Taskforce on the Diagnosis and Management of LSS confirmed a list of 14 history items. An on-line survey was developed that permits specialists to express the logical order in which they consider the items, and the level of certainty ascertained from the questions. Phase 2 (Delphi Study) Round 1: Survey distributed to members of the International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine. Round 2: Meeting of 9 members of Taskforce where consensus was reached on a final list of 10 items. Round 3: Final survey was distributed internationally. Phase 3: Final Taskforce consensus meeting. RESULTS.: 279 clinicians from 29 different countries, with a mean of 19 (±SD: 12) years in practice participated. The six top items were “leg or buttock pain while walking”, “flex forward to relieve symptoms”, “feel relief when using a shopping cart or bicycle”, “motor or sensory disturbance while walking”, “normal and symmetric foot pulses”, “lower extremity weakness” and “low back pain”. Significant change in certainty ceased after 6 questions at 80% (p?<?.05). CONCLUSIONS.: This is the first study to reach an international consensus on the clinical diagnosis of LSS, and suggests that within six questions clinicians are 80% certain of diagnosis. We propose a consensus-based set of “7 history items” that can act as a pragmatic criterion for defining LSS in both clinical and research settings, which in the long-term may lead to more cost-effective treatment, improved health-care utilization and enhanced patient outcomes.Level of Evidence: 2
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Slade, D.; Dionne, C.; Underwood, M.; Buchbinder, R.; Beck, B.; Bennell, K.; Brosseau, L.; Costa, L.; Cramp, F.; Cup, E.; Feehan, L.; Ferreir, M.; Forbes, S.; Glasziou, P.; Habets, B.; Harris, S.; Hay-Smith, J.; Hillier, S.; Hinman, R.; Holland, A.; Hondras, M.; Kelly, G.; Kent, Peter; Lauret, G.; Long, A.; Maher, C.; Morso, L.; Osteras, N.; Peterson, T.; Quinlivan, R.; Rees, K.; Regnaux, J.; Reitberg, M.; Saunders, D.; Skoetz, N.; Sogard, K.; Takken, T.; van Tulder, M.; Voet, N.; Ward, L.; White, C. (2016)Background: Exercise interventions are often incompletely described in reports of clinical trials, hampering evaluation of results and replication and implementation into practice. Objective: The aim of this study was to ...
Discordant identification of pediatric severe sepsis by research and clinical definitions in the SPROUT international point prevalence studyWeiss, S.; Fitzgerald, J.; Maffei, F.; Kane, J.; Rodriguez-Nunez, A.; Hsing, D.; Franzon, D.; Kee, S.; Bush, J.; Roy, J.; Thomas, N.; Nadkarni, V.; Fontela, P.; Tucci, M.; Dumistrascu, M.; Skippen, P.; Krahn, G.; Bezares, E.; Puig, G.; Puig-Ramos, A.; Garcia, R.; Villar, M.; Bigham, M.; Polanski, T.; Latifi, S.; Giebner, D.; Anthony, H.; Hume, J.; Galster, A.; Linnerud, L.; Sanders, R.; Hefley, G.; Madden, K.; Thompson, A.; Shein, S.; Gertz, S.; Han, Y.; Williams, Teresa; Hughes-Schalk, A.; Chandler, H.; Orioles, A.; Zielinski, E.; Doucette, A.; Orioles, A.; Zielinski, E.; Doucette, A.; Zebuhr, C.; Wilson, T.; Dimitriades, C.; Ascani, J.; Layburn, S.; Valley, S.; Markowitz, B.; Terry, J.; Morzov, R.; McInnes, A.; McArthur, J.; Woods, K.; Murkowski, K.; Spaeder, M.; Sharron, M.; Wheeler, D.; Beckman, E.; Frank, E.; Howard, K.; Carroll, C.; Nett, S.; Jarvis, D.; Patel, V.; Higgerson, R.; Christie, L.; Typpo, K.; Deschenes, J.; Kirby, A.; Uhl, T.; Rehder, K.; Cheifetz, I.; Wrenn, S.; Kypuros, K.; Ackerman, K.; Maffei, F.; Bloomquist, G.; Rizkalla, N.; Kimura, D.; Shah, S.; Tigges, C.; Su, F.; Barlow, C.; Michelson, K.; Wolfe, K.; Goodman, D.; Campbel, L.; Sorce, L.; Bysani, K.; Monjure, T.; Evans, M.; Totapally, B.; Chegondi, M.; Rodriguez, C.; Frazier, J. (2015)Introduction: Consensus criteria for pediatric severe sepsis have standardized enrollment for research studies. However, the extent to which critically ill children identified by consensus criteria reflect physician ...
Clinical guidelines for management of bone health in Rett syndrome based on expert consensus and available evidenceJefferson, A.; Leonard, H.; Siafarikas, A.; Woodhead, H.; Fyfe, S.; Ward, L.; Munns, C.; Motil, K.; Tarquinio, D.; Shapiro, J.; Brismar, T.; Ben-Zeev, B.; Bisgaard, A.; Coppola, G.; Ellaway, C.; Freilinger, M.; Geerts, S.; Humphreys, P.; Jones, M.; Lane, J.; Larsson, G.; Lotan, M.; Percy, A.; Pineda, M.; Skinner, S.; Syhler, B.; Thompson, S.; Weiss, B.; Engerström, I.; Downs, Jennepher (2016)Objectives - We developed clinical guidelines for the management of bone health in Rett syndrome through evidence review and the consensus of an expert panel of clinicians. Methods - An initial guidelines draft was created ...