Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlmutairi, A.
dc.contributor.authorSun, Zhonghua
dc.contributor.authorPoovathumkadavi, A.
dc.contributor.authorAssar, T.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T12:39:42Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T12:39:42Z
dc.date.created2015-10-25T20:18:58Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationAlmutairi, A. and Sun, Z. and Poovathumkadavi, A. and Assar, T. 2015. Dual Energy CT Angiography of Peripheral Arterial Disease: Feasibility of Using Lower Contrast Medium Volume. PLoS One. 10 (9).
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/23873
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0139275
dc.description.abstract

Objective: One of the main drawbacks associated with Dual Energy Computed Tomography Angiography (DECTA) is the risk of developing contrast medium-induced nephropathy (CIN). The aim of the present study was firstly, to design an optimal CT imaging protocol by determining the feasibility of using a reduced contrast medium volume in peripheral arterial DECTA, and secondly, to compare the results with those obtained from using routine contrast medium volume. Methods: Thirty four patients underwent DECTA for the diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease. They were randomly divided into two groups: Group 1 (routine contrast volume group) with n = 17, injection rate 4–5 ml/s, and 1.5 ml/kg of contrast medium, and Group 2 ((low contrast volume group), with n = 17, injection rate 4–5ml/s, and contrast medium volume 0.75 ml/kg. A fast kilovoltage—switching 64-slice CT scanner in the dual-energy mode was employed for the study. A total of 6 datasets of monochromatic images at 50, 55, 60, 65, 70 and 75 keV levels were reconstructed with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) at 50%. A 4-point scale was the tool for qualitative analysis of results. The two groups were compared and assessed quantitatively for image quality on the basis of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR). Radiation and contrast medium doses were also compared.Results: The overall mean CT attenuation and mean noise for all lower extremity body parts was significantly lower for the low volume contrast group (p<0.001), and varied significantly between groups (p = 0.001), body parts (p<0.001) and keVs (p<0.001). The interaction between group body parts was significant with CT attenuation and CNR (p = 0.002 and 0.003 respectively), and marginally significant with SNR (p = 0.047), with minimal changes noticed between the two groups. Group 2 (low contrast volume group) displayed the lowest image noise between 65 and 70 keV, recorded the highest SNR and CNR at 65 keV, and produced significantly lower results with respect to contrast medium volume and duration of contrast injection (p<0.001). The effect of radiation dose was not statistically significant between the two groups. Conclusions: DECTA images created at 65 keV and 50% ASIR with low contrast medium volume protocol, yielded results that were comparable to routine contrast medium volume, with acceptable diagnostic images produced during the evaluation of peripheral arteries.

dc.titleDual Energy CT Angiography of Peripheral Arterial Disease: Feasibility of Using Lower Contrast Medium Volume
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume10
dcterms.source.number9
dcterms.source.titlePLoS One
curtin.note

This open access article is distributed under the Creative Commons license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

curtin.departmentDepartment of Medical Radiation Sciences
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record