Priority-setting and rationing in healthcare: Evidence from the English experience
MetadataShow full item record
In a context of ever increasing demand, the recent economic downturn has placed further pressure on decision-makers to effectively target healthcare resources. Over recent years there has been a push to develop more explicit evidence-based priority-setting processes, which aim to be transparent and inclusive in their approach and a number of analytical tools and sources of evidence have been developed and utilised at national and local levels. This paper reports findings from a qualitative research study which investigated local priority-setting activity across five English Primary Care Trusts, between March and November 2012. Findings demonstrate the dual aims of local decision-making processes: to improve the overall effectiveness of priority-setting (i.e. reaching ‘correct’ resource allocation decisions); and to increase the acceptability of priority-setting processes for those involved in both decision-making and implementation. Respondents considered priority-setting processes to be compartmentalised and peripheral to resource planning and allocation. Further progress was required with regard to disinvestment and service redesign with respondents noting difficulty in implementing decisions. While local priority-setters had begun to develop more explicit processes, public awareness and input remained limited. The leadership behaviours required to navigate the political complexities of working within and across organisations with differing incentives systems and cultures remained similarly underdeveloped.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Structures and processes for priority-setting by health-care funders: a national survey of primary care trusts in EnglandRobinson, Suzanne; Dickinson, H.; Freeman, T.; Rumbold, B.; Williams, I. (2012)Although explicit priority-setting is advocated in the health services literature and supported by the policies of many governments, relatively little is known about the extent and ways in which this is carried out at ...
Bourne, A.; Johnston, R.; Cyril, S.; Briggs, Andrew; Clavisi, O.; Duque, G.; Harris, I.; Hill, C.; Hiller, C.; Kamper, S.; Latimer, J.; Lawson, A.; Lin, C.; Maher, C.; Perriman, D.; Richards, B.; Smitham, P.; Taylor, W.; Whittle, S.; Buchbinder, R. (2018)Objective Describe research methods used in priority-setting exercises for musculoskeletal conditions and synthesise the priorities identified. Design Scoping review. Setting and population Studies that elicited the ...
Identifying the most important research, policy and practice questions for substance use, problematic alcohol use and behavioural addictions in autism (SABA-A): A priority setting partnershipSinclair, J.M.A.; Aslan, B.; Agabio, R.; Anilkumar, A.; Brosnan, M.; Day, E.; Dowling, N.A.; Flood, C.; Grant, J.E.; Halliday, R.; Hofvander, B.; Howes, L.; Moseley, R.; Myers, Bronwyn ; O'Connor, V.; Shaya, G.; Thomas, S.; Robinson, J.; Chamberlain, S.R. (2023)Background: Autistic people are more likely to report problematic alcohol and other substance use when compared to the general population. Evidence suggests that up to one in three autistic adults may have an alcohol or ...