Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcEvoy, Peter
dc.contributor.authorMoulds, M.
dc.contributor.authorMahoney, A.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T12:47:48Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T12:47:48Z
dc.date.created2014-02-27T20:00:41Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationMcEvoy, Peter M. and Moulds, Michelle L. and Mahoney, Alison E.J. 2013. Mechanisms driving pre- and post-stressor repetitive negative thinking: Metacognitions, cognitive avoidance, and thought control. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 44 (1): pp. 84-93.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/25307
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.07.011
dc.description.abstract

Background and objectives: Repetitive negative thinking (RNT) is common to multiple emotional disorders and occurs before, during, and following a stressor. One replicated difference between common forms of RNT such as worry and rumination is temporal orientation towards a stressor, with worry being more future-oriented and rumination more past-oriented. Different mechanisms may drive RNT at these different time points. The aim of Study 1 was to examine whether previously demonstrated relationships between post-stressor RNT and mechanisms theorized to drive engagement in RNT, including metacognitive beliefs, cognitive avoidance strategies, and thought control strategies, would be replicated with anticipatory (pre-stressor) RNT. The aim of Study 2 was to replicate these associations in a new sample that completed measures of both pre- and post-stressor RNT.Method: Participants in Study 1 (N = 175) completed the RNT-L in anticipation of a stressor, along with measures of metacognitive beliefs, cognitive avoidance strategies, and thought control strategies. Participants in Study 2 (N = 91) completed the measures both before and after a stressor. Results: Pre- and post-stressor RNT were significantly correlated with all three mechanism measures. Metacognitive beliefs that RNT is uncontrollable and dangerous, and the thought control strategy of punishment, were most consistently and uniquely associated with RNT at both time-points.Limitations: Replication with clinical samples and with reference to a broader array of stressors is required. The correlational design precluded causal conclusions.Conclusions: Common and possibly some distinct mechanisms drive RNT before and after a stressor.

dc.publisherElsevier BV; North Holland
dc.subjectThought control
dc.subjectMetacognitions
dc.subjectRepetitive thinking
dc.subjectCognitive avoidance
dc.subjectTransdiagnostic
dc.titleMechanisms driving pre- and post-stressor repetitive negative thinking: Metacognitions, cognitive avoidance, and thought control
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume44
dcterms.source.startPage84
dcterms.source.endPage93
dcterms.source.issn00057916
dcterms.source.titleJournal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
curtin.note

NOTICE: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, Vol. 44, Issue 1. (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.07.011

curtin.department
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record