Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEdmondston, S.
dc.contributor.authorWaller, Rob
dc.contributor.authorVallin, P.
dc.contributor.authorHolthe, A.
dc.contributor.authorNoebauer, A.
dc.contributor.authorKing, E.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T12:48:54Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T12:48:54Z
dc.date.created2015-10-29T04:09:48Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationEdmondston, S. and Waller, R. and Vallin, P. and Holthe, A. and Noebauer, A. and King, E. 2011. Thoracic spine extension mobility in young adults: Influence of subject position and spinal curvature. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy. 41 (4): pp. 266-273.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/25535
dc.identifier.doi10.2519/jospt.2011.3456
dc.description.abstract

TTSTUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. TTOBJECTIVES: To examine extension mobility of the thoracic spine in young, asymptomatic adults, with particular reference to the influence of subject position and magnitude of the thoracic kyphosis. TTBACKGROUND: Impairment of thoracic extension motion is commonly associated with mechanical pain disorders in this region of the spine. Knowledge of normal thoracic mobility and the factors that may influence this motion is important in the evaluation and management of thoracic pain disorders. TTMETHODS: In 40 asymptomatic adults, the total and regional thoracic extension range of motion was measured using 2-dimensional photographic image analysis. Extension mobility was measured in standing, sitting, prone, and 4-point kneeling. The association between the magnitude of the habitual thoracic kyphosis and extension mobility was also examined. TTRESULTS: When measured from the habitual standing position, the mean range of flexion was 11.5° (3.7°) and mean extension range was 8.7° (3.7°). Thoracic extension was significantly greater in unloaded positions compared to loaded positions (P<.001). The standing thoracic kyphosis angle was significantly correlated with the end range thoracic extension angle in all positions (r = 0.63-0.79, P<.001). There was a poor correlation between the thoracic kyphosis angle and thoracic extension range of motion in all positions (r = 0.11-0.34, P>.06). TTCONCLUSION: When measured from the habitual standing position, thoracic extension range of motion in young individuals is small and poorly correlated with the magnitude of the standing thoracic kyphosis. Unloaded positions (4-point kneeling and prone), compared to positions that load the spine (standing and sitting), appear to promote a greater range of thoracic extension motion.

dc.titleThoracic spine extension mobility in young adults: Influence of subject position and spinal curvature
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume41
dcterms.source.number4
dcterms.source.startPage266
dcterms.source.endPage273
dcterms.source.issn0190-6011
dcterms.source.titleJournal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
curtin.departmentSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science
curtin.accessStatusOpen access via publisher


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record