The effect of poser race on the happy categorization advantage depends on stimulus type, set size, and presentation duration
MetadataShow full item record
The question as to whether poser race affects the happy categorization advantage, the faster categorization of happy than of negative emotional expressions, has been answered inconsistently. Hugenberg (2005) found the happy categorization advantage only for own race faces whereas faster categorization of angry expressions was evident for other race faces. Kubota and Ito (2007) found a happy categorization advantage for both own race and other race faces. These results have vastly different implications for understanding the influence of race cues on the processing of emotional expressions. The current study replicates the results of both prior studies and indicates that face type (computer-generated vs. photographic), presentation duration, and especially stimulus set size influence the happy categorization advantage as well as the moderating effect of poser race. © 2012 American Psychological Association.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Facial race and sex cues have a comparable influence on emotion recognition in Chinese and Australian participantsCraig, Belinda; Zhang, J.; Lipp, Ottmar (2017)The magnitude of the happy categorisation advantage, the faster recognition of happiness than negative expressions, is influenced by facial race and sex cues. Previous studies have investigated these relationships using ...
Craig, Belinda; Lipp, Ottmar (2018)Although the human face provides multiple sources of social information concurrently (race, sex, age, etc.), the majority of studies investigating how social category cues influence emotional expression perception have ...
Lipp, Ottmar; Craig, B.; Dat, M. (2015)Happy faces are categorized faster as “happy” than angry faces as “angry,” the happy face advantage. Here, we show across three experiments that the size of the happy face advantage for male Caucasian faces varies as a ...