Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLloyd, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorWoodside, Arch
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T12:59:09Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T12:59:09Z
dc.date.created2014-03-05T20:00:27Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationLloyd, Stephen and Woodside, Arch. 2013. Animals, Archetypes, and Advertising (A3): The Theory and the Practice of Customer Brand Symbolism. Journal of Marketing Management. 29 (1-2): pp. 5-25.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/27455
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/0267257X.2013.765498
dc.description.abstract

This study provides a theoretical grounding from social anthropology and psychoanalysis into the use of animal symbolism in marketing communications. The study analyses the adoption of animal symbols in brand communications, and considers these as either implicitly anthropomorphic (totemic) or explicitly anthropomorphic (fetishist). Contemporary advertising messages, as they become more visual, indirect, and implicit in their content (Phillips & McQuarrie, 2002), continue to employ animal symbols. Such integration of animal symbols serves to activate and connect archetypal associations automatically in consumers’ minds, thereby enabling them to activate the cultural schema that the brand represents. The effective application of cultural schema associated with a brand contributes to brand engagement and thereby to brand equity.

dc.publisherRoutledge
dc.titleAnimals, Archetypes, and Advertising (A3): The Theory and the Practice of Customer Brand Symbolism
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume29
dcterms.source.number1-2
dcterms.source.startPage5
dcterms.source.endPage25
dcterms.source.issn0267-257X
dcterms.source.titleJournal of Marketing Management
curtin.department
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record