Uses of music in everyday life
Access Status
Authors
Date
2004Type
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Source Title
ISSN
Remarks
Published as North, Adrian C. and Hargreaves, David J. and Hargreaves, Jon J. 2004. Uses of music in everyday life. Music Perception. 22 (1): pp. 41-77. © 2004 by the Regents of the University of California. Copying and permissions notice: Authorization to copy this content beyond fair use (as specified in Sections 107 and 108 of the U. S. Copyright Law) for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted by the Regents of the University of California for libraries and other users, provided that they are registered with and pay the specified fee via Rightslink® on [Caliber (<a href="http://legacy.ucpress.net/">http://legacy.ucpress.net/</a>)] or directly with the Copyright Clearance Center, <a href="http://www.copyright.com."">http://www.copyright.com."</a>
Collection
Abstract
The value of music in people’s everyday lives depends on the uses they make of it and the degree to which they engage with it, which are in turn dependent on the contexts in which they hear it. Very few studies have investigated people’s experiences of music in naturalistic, everyday circumstances, and this exploratory study provides some initial normative data on who people listen with, what they listen to (and what their emotional responses to this music are), when they listen, where they listen, and why they listen. A total of 346 people who owned a mobile phone were sent one text message per day for 14 days. On receiving this message, participants were required to complete a questionnaire about anymusic they could hear, or had heard since their previous message. Responses indicated a high compliance rate; a high incidence of exposure to music; that the greatest number of musical episodes occurred while participants were on their own; that pop music was heard most frequently; that liking for the music varied depending on who the participant was with, where they were, and whether they had chosen to be able to hear music; that music was usually experienced during the course of some activity other than deliberate music listening; that exposure to music occurred most frequently in the evening, particularly between 10PM and 11 PM, and on weekends; that music was heard most frequently at home, with only a small number of incidences occurring in public places; that the importance of several functions of music varied according to temporal factors, the place where the music was heard, and the person or people the participant was with. Further research shouldinclude participants from a greater range of sociodemographic backgrounds and should develop context-specific theoretical explanations of the different ways in which people use music as a resource.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Krause, Amanda; North, Adrian (2017)This study uses Mehrabian and Russell's () Pleasure-Arousal-Dominance (PAD) model to consider how responses to both the music heard and overall in-situ listening experience are influenced by the listener's degree of control ...
-
Krause, Amanda; North, Adrian; Hewitt, Lauren (2014)Mehrabian and Russell’s (1974) Pleasure–Arousal–Dominance model states that a propensity to approach/avoid an environment can be conceptualized in terms of the pleasure and arousal it elicits and one’s degree of dominance ...
-
McCallum, J.; Dzidic, Peta (2018)© 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Music is an important part of the human experience, arguably contributing to identity and the formation of relationships and group memberships. However, the ...