Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFernandez, R.
dc.contributor.authorPeters, S.
dc.contributor.authorCarey, Renee
dc.contributor.authorDavies, M.
dc.contributor.authorFritschi, Lin
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T13:05:12Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T13:05:12Z
dc.date.created2014-10-15T20:00:18Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationFernandez, R. and Peters, S. and Carey, R. and Davies, M. and Fritschi, L. 2014. Assessment of Exposure to Shiftwork Mechanisms in the General Population: the Development of a New Job-Exposure Matrix. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 71 (10): pp. 723-729.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/28457
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/oemed-2014-102101
dc.description.abstract

Objective. To develop a job-exposure matrix (JEM) that estimates exposure to eight variables representing different aspects of shiftwork among female workers. Methods. Occupational history and shiftwork exposure data were obtained from a population-based breast cancer case–control study. Exposure to light at night, phase shift, sleep disturbances, poor diet, lack of physical activity, lack of vitamin D, and graveyard and early morning shifts, was calculated by occupational code. Three threshold values based on the frequency of exposure were considered (10%, 30% and 50%) for use as cut-offs in determining exposure for each occupational code. JEM-based exposure classification was compared with that from the OccIDEAS application (job-specific questionnaires and assessment by rules) by assessing the effect on the OR for phase shift and breast cancer. Using data from the Australian Workplace Exposure Study, the specificity and sensitivity of the threshold values were calculated for each exposure variable. Results. 127 of 413 occupational codes involved exposure to one or more shiftwork variables. Occupations with the highest probability of exposure shiftwork included nurses and midwives. Using the 30% threshold, the OR for the association between phase shift exposure and breast cancer was decreased and no longer statistically significant (OR=1.14, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.42). The 30% cut-off point demonstrated best specificity and sensitivity, although results varied between exposure variables. Conclusions This JEM provides a set of indicators reflecting biologically plausible mechanisms for the potential impact of shiftwork on health and may provide an alternative method of exposure assessment in the absence of detailed job history and exposure data.

dc.publisherBMJ Group
dc.titleAssessment of Exposure to Shiftwork Mechanisms in the General Population: the Development of a New Job-Exposure Matrix
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume71
dcterms.source.startPage723
dcterms.source.endPage729
dcterms.source.issn13510711
dcterms.source.titleOccupational and Environmental Medicine
curtin.note

This article has been accepted for publication in Occupational and Environmental Medicine following peer review. The definitive copyedited, typeset version Fernandez, R. and Peters, S. and Carey, R. and Davies, M. and Fritschi, L. 2014. Assessment of Exposure to Shiftwork Mechanisms in the General Population: the Development of a New Job-Exposure Matrix. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 71 (10): pp. 723-729, is available at http://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2014-102101

curtin.departmentSchool of Public Health
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record