Clopidogrel, Prasugrel or Ticagrelor in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
MetadataShow full item record
Background: Guidelines recommend prasugrel or ticagrelor instead of clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Aim: We sought to describe the trends in uptake of the newer agents and analyse the clinical characteristics and short-term outcomes of patients treated with clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticagrelor. Methods: We analysed the temporal trends of antiplatelet use since the availability of prasugrel (2009–2013) in patients with ACS from the Melbourne Interventional Group registry. To assess clinical characteristics and outcomes, we included 1850 patients from 2012 to 2013, corresponding to the time all three agents were available. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The safety end-point was in-hospital bleeding. Results: For the period of 2009–2013, the majority of patients were treated with clopidogrel (72%) compared with prasugrel (14%) or ticagrelor (14%). There was a clear trend towards ticagrelor by the end of 2013. Patients treated with clopidogrel were more likely to present with non-ST-elevation ACS, be older, and have more comorbidities. There was no difference in unadjusted 30-day mortality (0.9 vs 0.5 vs 1.0%, P = 0.76), myocardial infarction (2 vs 1 vs 2%, P = 0.52) or MACE (3 vs 3 vs 4%, P = 0.57) between the three agents. There was no difference in in-hospital bleeding (3 vs 2 vs 2%, P = 0.64). Conclusion Prasugrel and ticagrelor are increasingly used in ACS patients treated with PCI, predominantly in a younger cohort with less comorbidity. Although antiplatelet therapy should still be individualised based on the thrombotic and bleeding risk, our study highlights the safety of the new P2Y12 inhibitors in contemporary Australian practice.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
The effect of intended duration of clopidogrel use on early and late mortality and major adverse cardiac events in patients with drug-eluting stentsButler, M.; Eccleston, D.; Clark, D.; Ajani, A.; Andrianopoulos, N.; Brennan, A.; New, G.; Black, A.; Szto, G.; Reid, Christopher; Yan, B.; Shaw, J.; Dart, A.; Duffy, S. (2009)Background: The optimal duration of clopidogrel use for prevention of stent thrombosis with drug-eluting stent (DES) use is uncertain. Our objective was to determine whether the planned duration of clopidogrel at the time ...
Pretreatment with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes undergoing Percutaneous Coronary InterventionYudi, M.; Eccleston, D.; Andrianpoulos, N.; Farouque, O.; Duffy, S.; Brennan, A.; Reid, Christopher; Clark, D.; Ajani, A. (2015)Background - Although dual antiplatelet therapy is the standard of care in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS), it remains unclear when a second antiplatelet agent should be initiated. We sought ...
Antithrombotic regimens in patients with percutaneous coronary intervention whom an anticoagulant is indicated: A systematic review and network meta -analysisBunmark, W.; Jinatongthai, P.; Vathesatogkit, P.; Thakkinstian, A.; Reid, Christopher; Wongcharoen, W.; Chaiyakunapruk, N.; Nathisuwan, S. (2018)Background: Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who require anticoagulant therapy are at increased risk of bleeding. The optimal regimen for these patients is uncertain. This study aimed to compare ...